School of Irrigation and drainage, Collage of Abouraihan, University of Tehran,Tehran,Iran
Measuring sensitivity of hydraulic structures is considered as an approach for evaluation of water projects performance, due to lower distribution efficiency in Irrigation and Drainage project schemes. Sensitivity analysis approach for irrigation structures is one of flow analysis methods which are developed in recent years in order to measure the behavior of flow in hydraulic structures in an irrigation network. This study examines the sensitivity of offtake structures in Varamin irrigation and drainage network project, which is one of the modern networks in Iran. The sensitivity measurement was carried out by the use of collected data from field in years of 2010, 2011 and 2012, and compared them with the water requirement for crop pattern calculated by CROPWAT model. Flow channel simulation was conducted in the project to identify the most sensitive offtake structures, due to inappropriate allocation of water particularly in downstream of network. Simulation and evaluation were carried out using SOBEK hydrodynamic model, and relationships introduced for sensitivity measures for offtake structures. Investigations and sensitive analysis on hydraulics structures in Varamin Irrigation network showed that Baffle modules have significant sensitivity. According to reviewed equations, sensitivity of Baffle modules is related to upstream depth, and opening of NEYRPIC module gates; which occurred more in terminal structures. The best way to have an optimal operation in this network is supply of required water depth in downstream of each canal. In these circumstances, the water depth in all offtakes is provided, and does not make any changes in the opening modules also.
1. Albinson B (1986) Network Planning Criteria: Hydraulic Aspects, Guideline 5, Annex 1, in: Design and Operation Guidelines for Structured Irrigation networks. Forth Draft, South East Asia Division, World Bank, WA, DC, USA.
2. Beirami MK (2010) Water Conveyance Structure. Publication of Isfahan University of Technology.
3. FAO (1975) Small hydraulic structures models. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 26/2, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 29-5-100161-8 Rome, Italy.
4. Ghumman AR, Khan Z and Turral H (2009) Study of feasibility of night-closure of irrigation canals for water saving. Agriculture Water Management 96(2009) 457-464.
5. Horst L (1983) Irrigation Systems Internal Report. Agricultural University Wageningen, The Netherland.
6. Mahbub SI , ND Gulhati (1951) Irrigation Outlets. Atma Ram. Delhi India.
7. Montazar A and Kouchakzadeh S (2005) Application of hydraulic sensitivity indicators in canal assessment. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 54: 443-454.
8. Renault D, HM Hemahumara (1999) Irrigation Off takes Sensitivity .Journal Irrigation and Drainage .125(3):132-136.
9. Renault D (2000) Aggregated Sensitivity Indicators of Irrigation Systems Hydraulic Behaviour. Agriculture Water Management.43 (2), 151-171.
10. Shanan L (1992) Planning and Management of Irrigation system in Developing Countries. Agricultural Water Management, 22(1+2), the Netherlands, Elsevier.
11. Seyedjavad MS (2013) Evaluating the Operational Approaches of Varamin Irrigation Network Using SOBEK Model. Irrigation and drainage master thesis. Irrigation and drainage department Collage of Abourayhan University of Tehran.
12. WL/Delft Hydraulic (2000) Sobek Manual and Technical Reference The Netherlands.