Evaluating performance of meta-heuristic algorithms and decision tree models in simulating water level variations of dams’ piezometers

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Baft Branch, Islamic Azad University, Baft, Iran

2 Department of Water Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

Abstract

Monitoring the seepage, particularly the piezometric water level in the dams, is of special importance in hydraulic engineering. In the present study, piezometric water levels in three observation piezometers at the left bank of Jiroft Dam structure (located in Kerman province, Iran) were simulated using soft computing techniques and then compared using the measured data. For this purpose, the input data, including inflow, evaporation, reservoir water level, sluice gate outflow, outflow, dam total outflow, and piezometric water level, were used. Modeling was performed using multiple linear regression method as well as soft computing methods including regression decision tree, classification decision tree, and three types of artificial neural networks (with Levenberg-Marquardt, particle swarm optimization, PSO, and harmony search learning algorithms, HS). The results of the present study indicated no absolute superiority for any of the methods over others. For the first piezometer the ANN-PSO indicates better performance (correlation coefficient, R=0.990). For the second piezometer ANN-PSO shows better results with R=0.945. For the third piezometers MLR with R=0.945 and ANN-HS with R=0.949 indicate better performance than other methods. Furthermore, Mann-Whitney statistical analysis at confidence levels of 95% and 99% indicated no significant difference in terms of the performance of the applied models used in this study.

Keywords


  1. Rankovic, V. Novakovic, A. Grujovic, N. Divac, D. & Milivojevic, N. 2014 Predicting piezometric water level in dam via artificial neural network. Neural Computing & Applications 24 (5), 1115-1121.
  2. Li, M. C. Guo, X. Y. Shi, J. & Zhu, Z. B. 2015 Seepage and stress of anti- seepage structures constructed with different concrete materials in an RCC gravity dam.Water Science and Engineering 8 (4), 326-334.
  3. Tan, X. Wang, X. Khoshnevisan, S. & Hou, X. 2017 Seepage analysis of earth dams considering spatial variability of hydraulic parameters. Engineering Geology 228, 260-269.
  4. Xiang, Y. Fu, Y. S. Zhu, K. Yuan, H. & Fang, Z. Y. 2017 Seepage safety monitoring model of an earth rock dam under influence of high-impact typhoons on particle swarm optimization method. Water science and Engineering 10 (1), 70-77.
  5. Zhou, C. B. Liu, W. Chen, Y. F. Hu, R. & Wei. K. 2015 Inverse modeling of leakage through a rockfill dam foundaction during its construction stage using transient flow model, neural network and genetic algorithm. Engineering Geology 187, 183-195.
  6. Su, H. Tian, S. Kang, Y. Xie, W. & Chen, J.2017 Monitoring water seepage velocity in dikes using distributed optical fiber temperature sensors. Automation in Construction 76, 71-84.
  7. Turkmen, S. Ozguler, E. Taga, H. & Karaogullarindan, T. 2002 Seepage problems in the karstic limestone foundation of the Kalecik Dam (south Turkey). Engineering Geology 63 (3-4), 247-257.
  8. Tayfur, G. Swiatek, D. Wita, A. & Singh, V.P. 2005 Case study: finite element method and artificial neural network models for flow through Jeziorsko Earthfill Dam in Poland. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 131 (6), 431-440.
  9. Gholizadeh, S. & Seyedpoor, S. M. 2011 Shape optimization of arch dam by metaheuristics and neural networks for frequency constraints Science Iranica 18 (5), 1020-1027.
  10. Stojanovic, B. Milivojevic, M. Milivojevic, N. & Antonijevic, D. 2016 A self-tuning system for dam behavior modeling based on evolving artificial neural network. Advances in Engineering Software 97, 85-95.
  11. Nourani, V. Mousavi, S. Sadikoglu, F. & Singh, V. 2017 Experimental and AI-based numerical modeling of contaminant transport in porous media.Journal of Hydrology 205, 78-95.
  12. Peymab Company. 1991 Report of Jiroft Dam Study.
  13. Zounemat-Kermani, M., 2012 Hourly predictive Levenberg–Marquardt ANN and multi linear regression models for predicting of dew point temperature. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 117(3-4),181-192.
  14. Breiman, L. Friedman, J. H. Olshen, R. A. & Stone, C.J. 1984 Classification and regression tree. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  15. Swetapadma, A., & Yadav, A. (2017). A novel decision tree regression-based fault distance estimation scheme for transmission lines. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 32(1), 234-245.
  16. Lagacherie, P. & Holmes, S. 1997 Addressing geographical data errors in a classification tree for soil unit prediction. International Journal Geographical Information Science 11 (2),183-198.
  17. Salazar, F. Toledo, M. A. Onate, E. & Suarez, B.2016 Interpretation of dam deformation and leakage with boosted regression tree. Engineering Structures 119, 230-251.
  18. Nerini, D. Durbec, J. P. Mante, C. Garcia, F. & Ghattas, B. 2000 Forecasting physicochemical variables by a classification tree method application to the Berre Lagoon (South France). Acta Biotheoretica 48 (3-4), 181-196.
  19. Paensuwan, N. Yokoyma, A. Verma, S.C. & Nakachi, Y. 2011 Application of Decision Tree Classification to the Probabilistic TTC Evaluation. Journal of International Council on Electrical Engineering 1 (3), 223-330
  20. Seyedashraf, O. Rezaei, A. & Akhtari, A. A. 2017 Dam break flow solution using artificial neural network. Ocean Engineerig 142, 125-132.
  21. Zounemat-Kermani, M., 2014 Principal component analysis (PCA) for estimating chlorophyll concentration using forward and generalized regression neural networks. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 28(1), pp.16-29.
  22. Sapna, S. Tamilarasi, A. & Kumar, M. P. 2012 Backpropagation Learning Algorithm Based on Levenberg Marquardt Algorithm.Computer Science & Information Technology 07, 393-398.
  23. Alsmadi, M. K. S. Omar, K. B. & Noah, S.A. 2009 Back Propagation Algorithm: The Best Algorithm among Multi-layer Perceptron Algorithm. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. 9,378-383.
  24. Hamid, N. A. Nawi, N. M. GhaZali, R. & Salleh, M. N. M . 2011 Accelerating Learning Performance of Back Propagation Algorithm by Using Adaptive Gain Together with Adaptive Momentum and Adaptive Learning Rate on Classification Problems. International Journal of Software Engineering and its Applications 5, 31-44.
  25. Zounemat-Kermani, M., Kisi, O. and Rajaee, T., 2013. Performance of radial basis and LM-feed forward artificial neural networks for predicting daily watershed runoff. Applied Soft Computing, 13(12), pp.4633-4644.
  26. Kennedy, J. Eberhart, R. 1995 Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE I nternational Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, 4, 1942-1948.
  27. Chau, K.W. 2006 Particle swarm optimization training algorighm for ANNs in stage prediction of Shing Mun River. Journal of Hydrology 329 (3-4), 363-367.
  28. Gyanesh, D. Prasant, K. P. & Sasmita, K. P. 2014 Artificial Neural Network trained by particle swarm optimization for non-linear channel equalization. Expert Systems with Application 41 (7), 3491-3496.
  29. Xiang, Y. Fu, Y. S. Zhu, K. Yuan, H. & Fang, Z. Y. 2017 Seepage safety monitoring model of an earth rock dam under influence of high-impact typhoons on particle swarm optimization method. Water science and Engineering 10 (1), 70-77.
  30. Mun, S. & Cho, Y. H. 2012 Modified harmony search optimization for constrained design problems. Expert Systems Applications 39 (1), 419-423.
  31. Geem, Z. W. Kim, J. & Loganathan, G. 2002 Harmony search optimization: Application to pipe network design. International Journal of Model Simulation 22, 125-133.
  32. Yadav, P. Kumar, R. Panda, S. K. Chang, C.S. 2012 An Intelligent Tuned Harmony Search algorithm for optimization. Information science 196, 47-72.
  33. Ruby, M. & Botez, R. M. 2016 Trajectory Optimization for vertical navigation using the Harmony Search algorithm. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (17), 11-16.