Exploring accuracy of statistical characterization of gravel beds using Kinect device in the laboratory scale

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Civil, arts and architecture, Islamic Azad University-Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Water Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Abstract

Mountainous river beds-generally consist of gravel particles that the precise description of such bed is not only important hydraulically, but also it has great environmental significance. The accurate estimation of bed roughness gives us valuable information to make reliable hydraulic models of flow in river with rigorous bed form. This study discuses about the accuracy of the Kinect device in determining the digital elevation model (DEM) of the gravel-bed. In this regard, the DEMs of the two beds include-hemispheres and two beds with artificial gravel beds have been -used and their statistical characteristics have been analyzed. The results show that while the error in the area among the particles is quite high, themethod can accurately conduct these in general. The comparison of the bed elevation histograms shows that although the artificial gravel beds histograms have higher accuracy compared to the histograms of the beds with hemispheres form, the gravel bed with distance elevations histogram shows the best fit among the four explored beds. Furthermore, exploring the statistical characteristics of these four beds shows that the Kinect device is able to obtain reasonable error rate in statistical parameters except the skewness quantity which has the highest rate of relative error. The variogram analysis of artificial gravel beds emphasis that the Kinect and scanner variograms reasonably close to each other and the longitudinal and transversal particles length scales are exactlythe same. According to the results of this investigation, application ofthe Kinect device in statistical analysis of the gravel beds can be suggested.

Keywords


  1. Boostani A., Esmaili K., "River engineering, from the past to the future (Evaluationof approaches and outlooks)," Journal of Water and Sustainable Developments, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 67-72, 2015.
  2. Hassannezhad Sharif F., Samadi A., Azizian Ghatar A., "Evaluation of Image Processing Technique in Estimating the Manning’s Roughness Coefficient in the Surface Layer of Riverbeds," Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 711-722, 2017.
  3. Lamarre H. and Roy A. G., "Reach scale variability of turbulent flow characteristics in a gravel-bed river," Geomorphology, Vols. 68, pp. 95-113, 2005.
  4. Buffin-Bélanger T., Roy A. G., "Effects of a pebble cluster on the turbulent structure of a depth-limited flow in a gravel-bed river," Geomorphology, 1998.
  5. Nikora V., Goring D., McEwan I. and Griffiths G., "Spatially averaged open-channel flow over rough bed," Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vols. 127,2, pp. 123-133, 2001.
  6. Graham D. J., Reid I. and Rice P., "Automated sizing of coarse-grained sediments: image-processing procedures," Mathematical Geology, vol. 37(1): 28, 2005.
  7. Mohajeri SH., Safarzadeh A., Salehi Neyshabouri A., "Determination of the Longitudinal Velocity Profile of Turbulent Flow over Rough Beds Using Double Averaging Method," Journal of Modares Civil Engineering, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 265-276, 2018.
  8. Nikora V. I., Koll k., McEwan I. K., McLean S. R., Dittrich A., "Velocity distribution in the roughness layer of rough-bed flows," Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vols. 130(7), pp. 1036-1042, 2004.
  9. Nikora V., Mcewan I., Mclean S., Coleman S., Pokrajac D. and Walters R., "Double averaging concept for rough-bed open-channel and overland flows: Theoretical background," Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vols. 133, 8, pp. 873-883, 2007.
  10. Hemmelder, S., Marra, W., Markies, H., De Jong, SM., "Monitoring river morphology & bank erosion using UAV imagery – A case study of the river Buëch, Hautes-Alpes, France," Journal of Applied Earth Observations & Geoinformation, vol. 73, pp. 428-437, 2018.
  11. James, MR., Chandler, JH., Eltner, A., "Guidelines on the use of structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry in geomorphic research," Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2019.
  12. Ashmore, P., Leduc, P., Peirce, S., "Short communication: Challenges and applications of structure-from-motion photogrammetry in a physical model of a braided river," Earth Surface Dynamics, vol. 7, pp. 97-106, 2019.
  13. Nikora V. I., Goring D. G. and Biggs B. F., "On gravel-bed roughness characterization," Water Resources Research, Vols. 34, pp. 517-527, 1998.
  14. Groom, J., Friedrich, H., "Spatial structure of near-bed flow properties at the grain scale," Geomorphology, vol. 327, pp. 14-27, 2019.
  15. Mohajeri H., Grizzi S., Righetti M., Romano G. P., Nikora V., "The structure of gravel-bed flow with intermediate submergence: a laboratory study," Journal of Water Resources Research.
  16. Bertin, S., Friedrich, H., "Measurement of gravel-bed topography: evaluation study applying statistical roughness analysis," Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 269-279, 2013.
  17. Ruther, N., Huber, S., Spiller, S., Abrele, J., "Verifying a photogrammetric method to quantify grain size distribution of developed armor layers," Proceedings of 2013 IAHR Congress, 2013.
  18. Micheletti, N., Chandler, J.H., Lane, S.N., "Structure from Motion (SFM) Photogrammetry," BSG, Vols. ISSN 2047-0371, 2015.
  19. Fonstad, M.A., Dietrich, J.T., Courville, B.C., Jensen, J.L., Carbonneau, P.E., "Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement," Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 421-430, 2013.
  20. Westoby, M.J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N.F., Hambrey, M.J.,Reynolds, J.M., "Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications," Geomorphology, vol. 179, pp. 300-314, 2012.
  21. Freedman, B., Shpunt, A., Machline, M., Arieli, Y., "Depth mapping using projected patterns.," Prime Sense Ltd., United States, 2010.
  22. Khoshelham K., Sander E., "Accuracy and Resolution of Kinect Depth Data for Indoor Mapping Applications," Sensors, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 1437–1454, 2012.
  23. "Solutionix C500," [Online]. Available: https://europac3d.com/3d-scanners/solutionix-c500/).
  24. Nikora V., Walsh J., "Water-worked gravel surfaces: High-order structure functions at the particle scale," Water Resource, vol. 40, 2004.
  25. R. A., "Fractal properties of simulated bed profiles in coarse-grained channels," Mathematical Geology, vol. 32, no. 3, p. 367–382, 1991.
  26. M. S. H., "Hydrodynamics of gravel bed flows (Implications in colmation)," PhD Thesis, Department of Civil, Mechanics and Environmental Engineering, University of Trento and School of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, 2014.
  27. James, M.R., Robson, S., "Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application," Journal of Geophysical Research, 2012.
  28. Davis A., Marshak A., Wiscombe W. & Cahalan R., "Multifractal characterizations of nonstationarity and intermittency in geophysical fields: Observed, retrieved, or simulated," Journal of Geophysics, vol. 99, p. 8055–8072, 1994.