Journal of Hydraulic Structures

Journal of Hydraulic Structures

A comparative study on the use of membrane bioreactor (MBR) and activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration (CAS/UF) processes for advanced treatment of industrial wastewater

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Hossein Sasani 1
Mehdi Ghasemi 2
1 Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran
10.22055/jhs.2021.38884.1193
Abstract
With increasing industrial wastewater reuse, due to inadequate water resources, membrane technology has shown results of very high efficiency in a wide range of reuse purposes and reverse osmosis (RO) pre-treatment. In the present study, the performance of two pilot-scale CAS/UF and MBR to polished effluent wastewater of an industrial town treatment plant were evaluated and compared in a continuous 43-day period. According to the test results, the removal efficiency of total suspended solids (TSS) for both reactors was nearly 100%. Nevertheless, the MBR improved the Chemical oxygen demand (COD) and the total dissolved solids (TDS) by nearly 3% and 5%, respectively. Total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) removals of approximately 31% and 20% in The MBR-based process and 24% and 18% in the CAS/UF module were obtained. Analysis of heavy metal concentration indicated that Cr, Pb, and Ni, which were in both soluble and particle forms, could be adequately eliminated by each system, while Cu, which was mainly in a soluble form, had a lower removal rate (32% and 51% in CAS/UF and MBR, respectively). Besides, since the silt density index (SDI) value for most of the samples was less than 3, both reactors can be used as RO pre-treatment systems.
Keywords
Membrane bioreactor (MBR)
CAS/UF
Heavy metal
Industrial wastewater
Organic micropollutant
  1. Hosseinzadeh M, Bidhendi GN, Torabian A, Mehrdadi N, (2013). Evaluation of membrane bioreactor for advanced treatment of industrial wastewater and reverse osmosis pretreatment. Journal of environmental health science and engineering. 11(1), pp.1-8.
  2. Rahimi Z, Zinatizadeh AA, Zinadini S, (2019). Milk processing wastewater treatment in an MBR: A comparative study on the use of two synthetic anti-fouling PES-UF membranes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 7(5), p. 103369.
  3. Hosseinzadeh, M., Nabi Bidhendi, G., Torabian, A. and Mehrdadi, N, (2014). A study on membrane bioreactor for water reuse from the effluent of industrial town wastewater treatment plant. Iranian Journal of Toxicology, 8(24), pp.983-990.
  4. Amin, M.M., Hashemi, H., Bina, B., Attar, H.M., Farrokhzadeh, H. and Ghasemian, M, (2010). Pilot-scale studies of combined clarification, filtration, and ultraviolet radiation systems for disinfection of secondary municipal wastewater effluent. Desalination, 260(1-3), pp.70-78.
  5. Ren, Z., Jia, B., Zhang, G., Fu, X., Wang, Z., Wang, P. and Lv, L, (2021). Study on adsorption of ammonia nitrogen by iron-loaded activated carbon from low temperature wastewater. Chemosphere, 262, p.127895.
  6. Hosseinzadeh, M., Bidhendi, G.N., Torabian, A., Mehrdadi, N. and Pourabdullah, M, (2015). A new flat sheet membrane bioreactor hybrid system for advanced treatment of effluent, reverse osmosis pretreatment and fouling mitigation. Bioresource technology, 192, pp.177-184.
  7. Park, S.Y., Choi, S.H., Chung, J.W. and Kwak, S.Y,(2015). Anti-scaling ultrafiltration/microfiltration (UF/MF) polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes with positive surface charges for Ca2+/silica-rich wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 480, pp.122-128.
  8. Li, Y., Sim, L.N., Ho, J.S., Chong, T.H., Wu, B. and Liu, Y, (2020). Integration of an anaerobic fluidized-bed membrane bioreactor (MBR) with zeolite adsorption and reverse osmosis (RO) for municipal wastewater reclamation: comparison with an anoxic-aerobic MBR coupled with RO. Chemosphere, 245, p.125569.
  9. Sahar, E., Messalem, R., Cikurel, H., Aharoni, A., Brenner, A., Godehardt, M., Jekel, M. and Ernst, M, (2011). Fate of antibiotics in activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration (CAS-UF) and in a membrane bioreactor (MBR). Water research, 45(16), pp.4827-4836.
  10. Arévalo, J., Garralón, G., Plaza, F., Moreno, B., Pérez, J. and Gómez, M.Á, (2009). Wastewater reuse after treatment by tertiary ultrafiltration and a membrane bioreactor (MBR): a comparative study. Desalination, 243(1-3), pp.32-41.
  11. Meng, F., Zhang, S., Oh, Y., Zhou, Z., Shin, H.S. and Chae, S.R, (2017). Fouling in membrane bioreactors: an updated review. Water research, 114, pp.151-180.
  12. Liu, X., Zhao, S., Zhang, X., Jia, W., Zou, Z. and Wang, Q, (2020). Application of sodium alginate as a coagulant aid for mitigating membrane fouling induced by humic acid in dead-end ultrafiltration process. Separation and Purification Technology, 253, p.117421.
  13. Du, Z., Ji, M. and Li, R, (2021). Alleviation of membrane fouling and enhancement of trace organic compounds removal in an electric field assisted microfiltration system. Chemical Engineering Journal, 407, p.127042.
  14. Hadler J, Kullmann C, (2012). Integrated membrane bioreactors (MBR) and reverse osmosis (RO) for water reuse. Filtrieren und Separieren. 2:40.
  15. Wang, J., Tang, X., Xu, Y., Cheng, X., Li, G. and Liang, H, (2020). Hybrid UF/NF process treating secondary effluent of wastewater treatment plants for potable water reuse: Adsorption vs. coagulation for removal improvements and membrane fouling alleviation. Environmental Research, 188, p.109833.
  16. Ohanessian K, Monnot M, Moulin P, Ferrasse JH, Barca C, Soric A, Boutin O. Dead-end and crossflow ultrafiltration process modelling: Application on chemical mechanical polishing wastewaters. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2020 Jun 1;158:164-76.
  17. Ohanessian, K., Monnot, M., Moulin, P., Ferrasse, J.H., Barca, C., Soric, A. and Boutin, O, (2020). Dead-end and crossflow ultrafiltration process modelling: Application on chemical mechanical polishing wastewaters. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 158, pp.164-176.
  18. Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., Gao, J. and Chung, T.S, (2016). Layer-by-layer construction of graphene oxide (GO) framework composite membranes for highly efficient heavy metal removal. Journal of membrane science, 515, pp.230-237.
  19. Ghiasinejad, H., Ghasemi, M., Pazoki, M. and Shariatmadari, N, (2021). Prediction of landfill leachate quantity in arid and semiarid climate: a case study of Aradkouh, Tehran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18(3), pp.589-600.
  20. Gómez, M., Plaza, F., Garralón, G., Pérez, J. and Gómez, M.A, (2007). A comparative study of tertiary wastewater treatment by physico-chemical-UV process and macrofiltration–ultrafiltration technologies. Desalination, 202(1-3), pp.369-376.
  21. Wang, H., Xu, G., Qiu, Z., Zhou, Y. and Liu, Y, (2019). NOB suppression in pilot-scale mainstream nitritation-denitritation system coupled with MBR for municipal wastewater treatment. Chemosphere, 216, pp.633-639.
  22. Gehlert, G., Abdulkadir, M., Fuhrmann, J. and Hapke, J, (2005). Dynamic modeling of an ultrafiltration module for use in a membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science, 248(1-2), pp.63-71
  23. Cai, W., Liu, J., Zhang, X., Ng, W.J. and Liu, Y, (2016). Generation of dissolved organic matter and byproducts from activated sludge during contact with sodium hypochlorite and its implications to on-line chemical cleaning in MBR. Water research, 104, pp.44-52.
  24. Chang, H.M., Sun, Y.C., Chien, I.C., Chang, W.S., Ray, S.S., Cao, D.T.N., Duong, C.C. and Chen, S.S, (2019). Innovative upflow anaerobic sludge osmotic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Bioresource technology, 287, p.121466.
  25. El-Fadel, M., Sleem, F., Hashisho, J., Saikaly, P.E., Alameddine, I. and Ghanimeh, S, (2018). Impact of SRT on the performance of MBRs for the treatment of high strength landfill leachate. Waste management, 73, pp.165-180.
  26. Massé, A., Spérandio, M. and Cabassud, C, (2006). Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water research, 40(12), pp.2405-2415.
  27. Ahmed, Z., Cho, J., Lim, B.R., Song, K.G. and Ahn, K.H, (2007). Effects of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor. Journal of membrane science, 287(2), pp.211-218.
  28. Pettinato, M., Chakraborty, S., Arafat, H.A. and Calabro, V, (2015). Eggshell: a green adsorbent for heavy metal removal in an MBR system. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 121, pp.57-62.
  29. Lerner, M., Stahl, N. and Galil, N.I, (2007). Comparative study of MBR and activated sludge in the treatment of paper mill wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 55(6), pp.23-29.
  30. Carletti, G., Pavan, P., Bolzonella, D. and Cavinato, C, (2007). Occurrence and removal of heavy metals from industrial and municipal wastewater: a comparison between MBR and conventional activated sludge processes (CAS). Chem Engr. Trans, 11, pp.875-880.
  31. Kent, F.C., Citulski, J. and Farahbakhsh, K, (2011). Water reclamation using membranes: Permeate water quality comparison of MBR and tertiary membrane filtration. Desalination, 274(1-3), pp.237-245.
  32. Kitanou, S., Tahri, M., Bachiri, B., Mahi, M., Hafsi, M., Taky, M. and Elmidaoui, A, (2018). Comparative study of membrane bioreactor (MBR) and activated sludge processes in the treatment of Moroccan domestic wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 78(5), pp.1129-1136.
  33. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, Water Environment Federation. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association.; 1912.
  34. Laurinonyte, J., Meulepas, R.J., van den Brink, P. and Temmink, H, (2017). Membrane bioreactor (MBR) as alternative to a conventional activated sludge system followed by ultrafiltration (CAS-UF) for the treatment of Fischer-Tropsch reaction water from gas-to-liquids industries. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 228(4), p.137.
  35. Pollice, A., Laera, G., Saturno, D. and Giordano, C, (2008). Effects of sludge retention time on the performance of a membrane bioreactor treating municipal sewage. Journal of Membrane Science, 317(1-2), pp.65-70.
  36. Sahar, E., Ernst, M., Godehardt, M., Hein, A., Herr, J., Kazner, C., Melin, T., Cikurel, H., Aharoni, A., Messalem, R. and Brenner, A, (2011). Comparison of Two Treatments for the Removal of Organic Micro-Pollutants: Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS) Followed by Ultrafiltration (UF) vs. Membrane Bioreactor (MBR). In Advanced Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment: A Road to Safer Society and Environment (pp. 147-161). Springer, Dordrecht.
  37. XU Jian. Impact of pretreatments on reverse osmosis treatment of secondary effluent [Master’s thesis]. University of Guelph. 2004.
  38. Meyo, H.B., Njoya, M., Basitere, M., Ntwampe, S.K.O. and Kaskote, E, (2021). Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater (PSW) Using a Pretreatment Stage, an Expanded Granular Sludge Bed Reactor (EGSB), and a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR). Membranes, 11(5), p.345.
  39. Hashemi, H. and Khodabakhshi, A, (2016). Complete treatment of compost leachate using integrated biological and membrane filtration processes. Iranian Journal Of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-International English Edition, 35(4), pp.81-87.
  40. Yuan, Y., Liu, J., Ma, B., Liu, Y., Wang, B. and Peng, Y, (2016). Improving municipal wastewater nitrogen and phosphorous removal by feeding sludge fermentation products to sequencing batch reactor (SBR). Bioresource technology, 222, pp.326-334.
  41. Weiss, S. and Reemtsma, T, (2008). Membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment–a viable option to reduce the amount of polar pollutants discharged into surface waters?. Water research, 42(14), pp.3837-3847.
  42. Sun, F.Y., Wang, X.M. and Li, X.Y, (2013). An innovative membrane bioreactor (MBR) system for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Process Biochemistry, 48(11), pp.1749-1756.
  43. Fu, F. and Wang, Q, (2011). Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. Journal of environmental management, 92(3), pp.407-418.
  44. Malamis, S., Katsou, E., Takopoulos, K., Demetriou, P. and Loizidou, M, (2012). Assessment of metal removal, biomass activity and RO concentrate treatment in an MBR–RO system. Journal of hazardous materials, 209, pp.1-8.
  45. Hashemi, H., Hoseini, M. and Ebrahimi, A.A., 2018. Flat sheet membrane sequencing batch bioreactor for the removal of coliforms and heavy metals from stabilized composting leachate. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 144(4), p.04018015.
  46. Abhang RM, Wani KS, Patil VS, Pangarkar BL, Parjane SB, (2013). Nanofiltration for recovery of heavy metal ions from waste water-a review. International Journal of Research in Environmental Science and Technology. 3(1), pp.29-34.
  47. Qin, J.J., Oo, M.H. and Coniglio, B, (2005). Relationship between feed pH and permeate pH in reverse osmosis with town water as feed. Desalination, 177(1-3), pp.267-272.
  48. Zhang, J., Chen, L., Zeng, H., Yan, X., Song, X., Yang, H. and Ye, C, (2007). Pilot testing of outside-in MF and UF modules used for cooling tower blowdown pretreatment of power plants. Desalination, 214(1-3), pp.287-298.
Journal of Hydraulic Structures
Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 16
Summer 2021
Pages 100-115