Application of Sluice Gate in Different Positions and Its Effect on Hydraulic Parameters in Free-Flow Conditions

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, East Azerbaijan, Iran

Abstract

Underpass gates are hydraulic structures in which water moves under the gate. Here, different models of gate position including vertical, deflection to upstream and downstream of the channel with respect to the vertical axis and also oblique position concerning the transverse axis at angles of 10°, 20° and 30° was investigated numerically with FLOW-3D software. Also its effect on discharge coefficient (Cd) and hydrodynamic force applied to the gate was checked. The nested mesh was used for modeling. The results indicated that the statistical indices such as Absolute Error (AE), percentage Relative Error (RE%) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in the RNG turbulence model were less than those of the k-ε, k-ω and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and were more accurate compared to the experimental results. Cd in the same discharges increases with the increasing angle to the upstream of the channel compared to the vertical position. Cd is inversely related to increasing the angle of the gate relative to the vertical axis in the downward position. In the oblique position, Cd decreases with increasing angle to the transverse axis of the channel due to the increase in the area of flow through the gate. This increase in angle and area of the flow passing through the gate leads to a decrease in the upstream fluid depth, therefore, less hydrodynamic force is applied to the gate. The upward inclined gate tolerates less hydrodynamic force than the downward and oblique positions. The maximum value is related to the downward position.

Keywords

References

  1. Henry H. R, (1950). Discussion on "Diffusion of Submerged Jets, "by Albertson, M. L. et al., Trans. Am. Society Civil Engrs, 115: 687.
  2. Rajaratnam N, Subramanya K, (1967). Flow Equation for the Sluice Gate. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 93(3): 167-186.
  3. Swamee PK, (1992). Sluice Gate Discharge Equations. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 118(1): 56-60.
  4. Shivapur AV, Shesha Prakash MN, (2005). Inclined Sluice Gate for Flow Measurement. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering; 11(1): 46-56.
  5. Nasehi Oskuyi N, Salmasi F, (2012). Vertical Sluice Gate Discharge Coefficient, Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism, 2(3): 108-114.
  6. Mohammed A, Moayed K, (2013). Gate Lip Hydraulics under Sluice gate. Modern Instrumentation. 2(1): 16-19. Doi: 10.4236/mi.2013.21003.
  7. Daneshfaraz R, Ghahramanzadeh A, Ghaderi A, Joudi AR, Abraham J, (2016). Investigation of the Effect of Edge Shape on Characteristics of Flow under Vertical Gates. Journal of American Water Works Association, Doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2016.108.0102.
  8. Ashkan F, Daneshfaraz R, ghaffarinik A, Gahramanzadeh A, Minaei O, (2019). Numerical Investigation of the Successive Sluice Gates Performance in Regulating Flow Rate through Channels Using Flow-3D Software. Water and Soil Science, 29(4): 85-96.
  9. Salmasi F, Nouri M, Sihag P, Abraham J, (2021). Application of SVM, ANN, GRNN, RF, GP and RT Models For Predicting Discharge Coefficients of Oblique Sluice Gates Using Experimental Data. Water Supply, 21(1): 232-248.
  10. Ma F Hou Y, Prinos P, (2001). Numerical Calculation of Submerged Hydraulic Jumps. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 39:5, 493-503, DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2001.9628274.
  11. Akoz M, Kirkgoz M, Oner A, (2009). Experimental and Numerical Modeling of a Sluice Gate Flow. J. Hydraul. Res., 47(2): 167-176.
  12. Cassan L, Belaud G, (2010). Experimental and Numerical Studies of the Flow Structure Generated by a Submerged Sluice Gate. Conference: 1st European IAHR Congress At: Edinburgh, U K.
  13. Ghaderi A, Dasineh M, Aristodemo F, Ghahramanzadeh A, (2020). Characteristics of free and submerged hydraulic jumps over different macroroughnesses. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 22 (6): 1554–1572.
  14. Ghaderi A, Dasineh M, Aristodemo F, Aricò C, (2021). Numerical Simulations of the Flow Field of a Submerged Hydraulic Jump over Triangular Macroroughnesses. Water, 13(5): 674.
  15. Daneshfaraz R, Aminvash E, Abbaszadeh H, (2021). Numerical Simulation of Energy Dissipation in Crescent-Shaped Contraction of the Flow Path. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research. 52(5): 1299-1314. Doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2021.318989.668895.
  16. Flow Science Inc. 2016 FLOW-3D V 11.2 User’s Manual, Santa Fe, NM, USA; 2016.
  17. Daneshfaraz R, Norouzi R, Abbaszadeh H, (2021). Numerical Investigation on Effective Parameters on Hydraulic Flows in Chimney Proportional Weirs. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research. 52(6): 1599-1616. Doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2021.322751.668944.
  18. Daneshfaraz R, Aminvash E, Esmaeli R, Sadeghfam S, Abraham J, (2020). Experimental and Numerical Investigation for Energy Dissipation of Supercritical Flow in Sudden Contractions. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 8(4): 396-406.
  19. Ghaderi A, Abbasi S, Abraham J, Azamathulla HM, (2020). Efficiency of Trapezoidal Labyrinth Shaped stepped spillways. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101711.
  20. Rajaratnam N, (1977). Free Flow Immediately Below Sluice Gates. Journal of the Hydraulics Division 103(4): 345-351.
  21. Nago H, (1978). Influence of Gate Shapes on Discharge Coefficients. Proceedings of Japan Society of Civil Engineers. pp. 59-71.
  22. Hager WH, (1999). Underflow of Standard Sluice Gate. Experiments in Fluids 27(4): 339-350. Doi:10.1007/s003480050358.
Journal of Hydraulic Structures
Volume 7, Issue 3 - Serial Number 17
November 2021
Pages 72-87

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics