Investigation of the Effect of Upstream Slope and Bed Material on the Rate of Pollutant Release to Downstream Dams Using a Two-Phase SPH algorithm

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sirjan University of Technology, Sirjan, Kerman, Iran.

2 State Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China, 116023

Abstract

Most of the pollution of dams, lakes and even coastal water is related to their upstream bed. When floods and drifts occur, the pollutants in the bed are carried into these bodies of water. There are several factors that influence the rate at which these pollutants are emitted. Among these factors, the material and slope of the bed play a crucial role, yet they have not been thoroughly investigated until now. Therefore, this study aims to model this phenomenon and examine the aforementioned parameters using a Lagrangian numerical method. The numerical method developed is the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH). The flow consists of two phases, one phase is considered a Newtonian fluid while the other phase is considered a non-Newtonian fluid. Due to the momentum of the fluid and the sharp changes in the flow, turbulent flow is assumed, and by approximating and calculating the turbulent viscosity, its effects are considered in the modeling. In addition to the fluid motion equations, the concentration equation is also solved to calculate the emission rate. After validating the computational code, nine different cases are modeled and evaluated based on the bed material and the slope of the bed. The results show that the change in each of these parameters has a significant effect on the emission of pollutants.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Dai Z, Huang Y, Cheng H, Xu Q, (2016). SPH model for fluid–structure interaction and its application to debris flow impact estimation. Landslides, pp: 14: 917-928.
  2. Göransson G, Norrman J, Larson M, (2018). Contaminated landslide runout deposits in rivers–Method for estimating long-term ecological risks. Sci Total Environ, pp: 642: 553–566.
  3. Pasculli A, Minatti L, Sciarra N, Paris E, (2013). SPH modeling of fast muddy debris flow: numerical and experimental comparison of certain commonly utilized approaches. Ital J Geosci, pp: 132(3):350–365.
  4. Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ, (1982). Kernel estimates as a basis for general particle methods in hydrodynamics. J comput Phys, pp: 46(3): 429–453.
  5. Bøckmann A, Shipilova O, Skeie G, (2012). Incompressible SPH for free surface flows. Computers & Fluids, pp: 67: 138-151.
  6. Zounemat-Kermani M, Sheybanifard H, (2016). Numerical investigation of free surface flood wave and solitary wave using incompressible SPH method. J Hydraul Struct, pp: 2(2): 22-34.
  7. Shamsoddini R, Aminizadeh N, (2017). Incompressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics modeling and investigation of fluid mixing in a rectangular stirred tank with free surface. Chem Eng Commun, pp: 204(5): 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2017.1290608.
  8. Shamsoddini R, Abolpour B, (2020). Bingham fluid sloshing phenomenon modeling and investigating in a rectangular tank using SPH method. Ships Offshore Struct, pp: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2020.1748373
  9. Shamsoddini R, Mofidi MR, (2021). ISPH modeling and investigation of the effect of viscosity variations on the fluids mixing in a microchannel due to oscillation of a circular cylinder. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng, pp: 118: 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2020.12.028.
  10. Laigle D, Lachamp Ph, Naaim M, (2007). SPH-based numerical investigation of mudflow and other complex fluid flow interactions with structures. Comput Geosci,  pp: 11(4): 297–306.
  11. Crespo AJC, Gómez-Gesteira M, Dalrymple RA, (2008). Modeling dam break behavior over a wet bed by an SPH technique. J Waterw Port Coast, pp: 134(6): 313–320.
  12. Minatti L, Pasculli A, (2011). SPH numerical approach in modeling 2D muddy debris flow. In: International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Proceedings, pp: 467–475.
  13. Liang Q, Xia X, Hou J, (2015). Efficient urban flood simulation using a GPU-accelerated SPH model. Environ Earth Sci, pp:74: 7285–7294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4753-4
  14. Fathi A., Ketabdari MJ, (2018). Modeling of emerged semi-circular breakwater performance against solitary waves using SPH method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, pp: 40, 290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1179-4
  15. Tayyebi SM, Pastor M, Stickle MM, (2021). Two-phase SPH numerical study of pore-water pressure effect on debris flows mobility: Yu Tung debris flow. Comput Geotech, pp: 132: 103973.
  16. Wendland H, (1995). Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree. Adv Comput Math, pp: 4(1): 389–396.
  17. Shadloo MS, · Zainali A, · Yildiz M, (2013). Simulation of single mode Rayleigh–Taylor instability by SPH method. Comput Mech, pp: 51:699–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0746-2
  18. Fatehi R, Shadloo MS, Manzari MT, (2014). Numerical investigation of two-phase secondary Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C, pp: 228(11): 1913-1924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406213512630
  19. Shadloo MS, Zainali A, Sadek SH, Yildiz M, (2011). Improved incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for simulating flow around bluff bodies. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, pp: 200: 1008–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.002.
  20. Maciel GF, Santos HK, Ferreira FO, (2009). Rheological analysis of water clay compositions to investigate mudflows developing in canals. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, pp: 31: 64-74
  21. Minussi RB, Maciel GF, (2011). Numerical Experimental Comparison of Dam Break Flows with non-Newtonian Fluids. J Braz Soc Mech Sci] Eng, pp: 34(2): 167-178.
  22. Spinewine, B. (2005). Two-layer flow behaviour and the effects of granulardilatancy in dam-break inducedsheet-flow. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. de Louvain,Louvain,Belgium.
  23. Shamsoddini R, SefidM, (2015). Lagrangian simulation and analysis of the power-law fluid mixing in the two-blade circular mixers using a modified WCSPH method. Pol J  Chem  Tech, pp:  17: 1-10