Experimental evaluation of dune formation downstream of pier scour hole with upstream debris accumulation

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran

Abstract

Debris upstream of the bridge pier and through the flow variations, changes scour hole and river morphology. Dune forms downstream of the pier as a result of sediment movement in the pier scour phenomenon. The present study investigates the dune characteristics and geometrical parameters in experimental models. Experimental models are categorized into four cases including the pier, pier with buried debris, pier with free debris, and pier with free debris which was protected by bed sill at four various distances from the pier downstream face. It was concluded that debris submergence, densimetric particle Froude number, flow intensity, and bed sill affect dune geometrical parameters such as dune height (hd), dune crest position (xd), and dune length (ld). Results show dune height increases with debris accumulation up to almost 150% and its crest distance from the pier reduces up to approximately 100%. Also, in higher Fd, the dune height and its crest distance reduce with bed sill up to 50%, and in lower Fd, hd, and xd increase by up to 80% by using bed sill. Based on these effective parameters, three separate equations were proposed for hd, xd, and ld in pier scour with debris accumulation protected by bed sill.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Lagasse PF, Clopper PE, Zevenbergen LW, (2010). Effects of debris on bridge pier scour. NCHRP Report 653, Transportation Research Board, National Academies of Science, Washington, D.C.
  2. Melville BW, Dongol DM, (1992). Bridge pier scour with debris accumulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 118, pp: 1306–1310. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:9(1306).
  3. Lagasse PF, Zevenbergen LW, Clopper PE, (2010). Impacts of debris on bridge pier scour. Scour and Erosion. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp: 854–863.
  4. Pagliara S, Carnacina I, (2010). Temporal scour evolution at bridge piers: effect of wood debris roughness and porosity. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 48(1), pp: 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680903568592.
  5. Pagliara S, Carnacina I, Cigni F, (2010). Sills and gabions as countermeasures at bridge pier in presence of debris accumulations. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 48(6), pp: 764-774. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2010.528184.
  6. Pagliara S, Carnacina I, (2011). Influence of wood debris accumulation on bridge pier scour. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 137, pp: 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.000028.
  7. Pagliara S, Carnacina I, (2011). Influence of large woody debris on sediment scour at bridge pier. International Journal of Sediment Research, 26, pp: 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(11)60081-4.
  8. Park JH, Sok C, Park CK, Do KY, (2016). A study on the effects of debris accumulation at sacrificial piles on bridge pier scour: I. Experimental Results. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20, pp: 1546–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0207-5.
  9. Rahimi E, Qaderi K, Rahimpour M, Ahmadi, MM, (2018). Effect of debris on piers group scour: an experimental study. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22, pp: 1496–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-2002-y.
  10. Abousaeidi Z, Ghaderi K, Rahimpour M, Ahmadi MM, (2018). Experimental investigation of the effect of debris accumulation on the local scour at bridge pier and abutment. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 25(2), pp: 267-282. 10.22069/JWSC.2018.12472.2714.
  11. Ebrahimi M, Kripakaran P, Prodanović DM, et al., (2018). Experimental study on scour at a sharp-nose bridge pier with debris blockage. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 144:04018071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001516.
  12. Pagliara S, Palermo M, (2020). Effects of bridge pier location and debris accumulation on equilibrium morphology. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress.
  13. Palermo M, Pagliara S, Roy D, (2021). Effect of debris accumulation on scour evolution at bridge pier in bank proximity. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 61, pp: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2020-0041.
  14. Hamidifar H, Mohammad Ali Nezhadian D, Carnacina I, (2022). Experimental study of debris-induced scour around a slotted bridge pier. Acta Geophysica, 70, pp: 2325–2339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00722-2.
  15. Hamidifar H, Shahabi-Haghighi SMB, Chiew YM, (2022). Collar performance in bridge pier scour with debris accumulation. International Journal of Sediment Research, 37, pp: 328-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2021.10.002.
  16. Akbari Dadamahalleh P, Hamidi M, Mahdian Khalili A, (2022). Experimental Prediction of the Bed Profile with the Full-submerged and Semi-submerged Debris Accumulation Upstream of the Cylindrical Bridge Pier. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 29(4), pp: 95-114.‏22069/JWSC.2023.20642.3582.
  17. Zanganeh-Inaloo F, Hamidifar H, Oliveto G, (2023). Local scour around riprap-protected bridge piers with debris accumulation. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng., 47(4), pp: 2393-2408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01034-9.
  18. Mahdian Khalili A, Hamidi M, Akbari Dadamahalleh P, (2023). Scour Morphology around the Bridge Pier with Upstream Rectangular Debris. 22nd Iranian Conference on Hydraulics, 8-9 November 2023, University of Maragheh.
  19. Oliveto G, Hager WH, (2014). Morphological evolution of dune-like bed forms generated by bridge scour. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 140(5), 06014009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000853.
  20. Pagliara S, Carnacina I, (2010). Scour and dune morphology in presence of large wood debris accumulation at bridge pier. In River Flow (Vol. 2, pp. 1223-1230).
  21. Chiew YM, (1992). Scour protection at bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 118, pp: 1260–1269. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:9(1260).
  22. Zarrati AR, Chamani MR, Shafaie A, Latifi M, (2010). Scour countermeasures for cylindrical piers using riprap and combination of collar and riprap. International Journal of Sediment Research, 25, pp: 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(10)60048-0.
  23. Grimaldi C, Gaudio R, Calomino F, Cardoso AH, (2009). Control of scour at bridge piers by a downstream bed sill. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 135, pp: 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2009)135:1(13).
  24. Grimaldi C, Gaudio R, Calomino F, Cardoso, AH, (2009). Countermeasures against local scouring at bridge piers: slot and combined system of slot and bed sill. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 135, pp: 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000035.
  25. Tafarojnoruz A, Gaudio R, Calomino F, (2012). Bridge pier scour mitigation under steady and unsteady flow conditions. Acta Geophysica, 60, pp: 1076-1097. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-012-0040-x.
  26. Khaple S, Hanmaiahgari PR, Gaudio R, Dey S, (2017). Splitter plate as a flow-altering pier scour countermeasure. Acta Geophysica, 65, pp: 957–975. https://doi.org/1007/s11600-017-0084-z.
  27. Pandey M, Azamathulla HM, Chaudhuri S, Pu JH, Pourshahbaz H, (2020). Reduction of time-dependent scour around piers using collars. Ocean Engineering, 213, 107692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107692.
  28. Raeisi N, Ghomeshi M, (2021). A laboratory study of the effect of asymmetric-lattice collar shape and placement on scour depth and flow pattern around the bridge pier. Water Supply 22, pp: 734-748. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.239.
  29. Saad NY, Fattouh EM, Mokhtar M, (2021). Effect of L-shaped slots on scour around a bridge abutment. Water Practice & Technology, 16(3), pp: 935-945. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2021.037.
  30. Koohsari A, Hamidi M, (2021). Experimental study of the effect of mining materials downstream of bridge pier on scour profile with optimizing distance approach. Journal of Water and Soil Conservations, 28(3), pp: 1-26. 10.22069/JWSC.2022.19400.3490.
  31. Ebrahimi T, Hamidi M, Rahmani Firoozjaiee A, Khavasi E, (2021). Numerical investigation of scour around a cylindrical pier in laboratory scale using Euler-Lagrange approach. Amirkabir Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 53(1 (Special Issue)), pp: 411-426. 22060/MEJ.2019.16679.6418.
  32. Sadeqlu M, Hamidi M, (2022). Numerical investigation of the cylindrical bridge pier scour reduction by installing a group of two submerged vanes. Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research, 22(85), pp: 91-114. https://doi.org/10.22092/idser.2022.357739.1502.
  33. Valela, C, Rennie CD, Nistor I, (2022). Improved bridge pier collar for reducing scour. International Journal of Sediment Research, 37(1), pp: 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2021.04.004.
  34. Khalili AM, Hamidi M, Dadamahalleh PA, (2023). Introducing Countermeasures for Reducing Bed Scour of Mountainous Rivers, 1st International Conference on Sustainable Mountain, 11&12 December 2023, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili.
  35. Khalili AM, Hamidi M, Dadamahalleh PA, (2023). Reviewing Ice Covering Effect on Bridge Pier Scour Morphology at Cold Climate, 1st International Conference on Sustainable Mountain, 11&12 December 2023, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili.
  36. Raudkivi AJ, Ettema R, (1983). Clear water scour at cylindrical piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 109(3), 338-350. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:3(338).
  37. Mahdian Khalili A, Hamidi M, (2023). Time evolution effect on the scour characteristics downstream of the sluice gate with the submerged hydraulic jump in a laboratory model. Journal of Hydraulic Structures 9(2), pp: 32-47. 10.22055/JHS.2023.43499.1249.
  38. Hamidi M, Mohammadhoseyni F, (2020). Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Stilling Basin Length on Flow Energy Dissipation (Case Study of the Chaili Dam Spillway). Irrigation and Water Engineering, 11(1), pp: 66-86. 22125/IWE.2020.114954.
  39. Biabani S, Hamidi M, Navayi Neya B, (2019). Numerical simulation of the chute convergence effects on forming the transverse wave in flood evacuation systems. Journal of Hydraulics, 14(3), pp: 67-84. 30482/JHYD.2019.174636.1373.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics