Hydraulic Response to Geometry: Finite Element Modeling of Underground Spaces in Saturated Environments

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

Abstract

Tunneling operations face a significant challenge in managing water inflow into excavated underground spaces, primarily initial or excavating caused discontinuities in tunnel walls. The water flow rate is intricately linked to the geometric shape of the tunnel, making it a crucial consideration during infrastructure design and construction to mitigate the risks associated with water infiltration. This study employs the finite element numerical method to explore how different geometric shapes (circular, D-shaped, rectangular, and irregular hexagon tunnels), along with parameters like excavated space area, excavated space perimeter, water head, and permeability coefficient anisotropy, influence steady-state water inflow into tunnel as saturated environments. Results demonstrate that the geometric shape of underground spaces has a substantial impact on water ingress, with circular tunnels exhibiting notably lower inflow rates compared to other shapes under similar conditions. However, the overall dimensions of the simulation model may also influence the observed impact. The research underscores the necessity of considering both geometric shape and overall dimensions for effective drainage in tunnel design. While circular tunnels generally prove to be a safe choice, further project-specific analysis may be warranted. It is crucial to acknowledge that accurately predicting the influence radius requires intricate numerical modeling or physical experiments accounting for all relevant factors, as the impact of shape is just one facet, with other design and geological factors playing equally crucial roles.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Cesano D. 1999. Prediction of Groundwater flows into Underground Constructions in Hard Rocks. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
  2. Maleki, Z., Farhadian, H., & Nikvar-Hassani, A. (2021). Geological hazards in tunnelling: the example of Gelas water conveyance tunnel, Iran. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 54(1), qjegh2019-114.
  3. Bashari Moghaddam, Z., Mohammadvali Samani, H., & Mousavi Jahromi, S. H. (2021). Turbulent Flow Modeling at Tunnel Spillway Concave Bends and Prediction of Pressure using Artificial Neural Network. Journal of Hydraulic Structures, 7(1), 1-15.
  4. Farhadian, H. (2021). A new empirical chart for rockburst analysis in tunnelling: Tunnel rockburst classification (TRC). International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 31(4), 603-610.
  5. Ghorbani, E., Ghadernejad, S., Emami, D., & Nejati, H. (2021). Estimating groundwater inflow into Dorud-Khorramabad railway tunnel using analytical and numerical methods. International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering, 55(1), 33-41.
  6. Farhadian, H., & Nikvar-Hassani, A. (2019). Water flow into tunnels in discontinuous rock: a short critical review of the analytical solution of the art. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78, 3833-3849.
  7. El Tani, M. (2003). Circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer. Tunnelling and underground space technology, 18(1), 49-55.
  8. Farhadian, H., & Katibeh, H. (2015). Groundwater seepage estimation into Amirkabir tunnel using analytical methods and DEM and SGR method. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 9(3), 296-301.
  9. Farhadian, H., Katibeh, H., & Huggenberger, P. (2016). Empirical model for estimating groundwater flow into tunnel in discontinuous rock masses. Environmental earth sciences, 75, 1-16.
  10. Farhadian, H., Katibeh, H., Huggenberger, P., & Butscher, C. (2016). Optimum model extent for numerical simulation of tunnel inflow in fractured rock. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 60, 21-29.
  11. Yoon, J. U., Han, J. W., Joo, E. J., & Shin, J. H. (2014). Effects of tunnel shapes in structural and hydraulic interaction. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18, 735-741.
  12. Han, G., Hu, M., & Li, Y. (2014). Effects of Tunnel Shape on Water-Sealed Oil Storage Caverns' Seepage Flow. In ICPTT 2014: Creating Infrastructure for a Sustainable World (pp. 724-731).
  13. Wu, J., Wu, L., Han, Y. H., Sun, M., & Lu, Y. N. (2023). Numerical investigation of water inflow and seepage characteristics in a tunnel crossing two overlapped parallel faults. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 11806.
  14. Wang, J., Wei, Y., Xie, Z., Jiang, X., Zhang, H., & Lu, K. (2020). Influence of the water spray flow rate and angle on the critical velocity in tunnels with longitudinal ventilation. Energy, 190, 116466.
  15. Yang, J. H., Jiang, Q. H., Zhang, Q. B., & Zhao, J. (2018). Dynamic stress adjustment and rock damage during blasting excavation in a deep-buried circular tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 71, 591-604.
  16. Su, K., Zhou, Y., Wu, H., Shi, C., & Zhou, L. (2017). An analytical method for groundwater inflow into a drained circular tunnel. Groundwater, 55(5), 712-721.
  17. Pan, Y. H., Qi, J. R., Zhang, J. F., Peng, Y. X., Chen, C., Ma, H. N., & Ye, C. (2022). A comparative study on steady-state water inflow into a circular underwater tunnel with an excavation damage zone. Water, 14(19), 3154.
  18. Nikvar Hassani, A., Katibeh, H., & Farhadian, H. (2016). Numerical analysis of steady-state groundwater inflow into Tabriz line 2 metro tunnel, northwestern Iran, with special consideration of model dimensions. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 75, 1617-1627.
  19. Farhadian, H., Maleki, Z., & Eslaminezhad, S. A. (2021). Assessment of the Optimum Depth of Sealing Cutoff Walls in the Clay Core of Peygham-Chay Dam. Journal of Hydraulic Structures, 7(1), 59-76.
  20. Moeini, H., Farhadian, H., & Nikvar-Hassani, A. (2018). Determination of the optimum sealing method for Azad pumped storage dam considering seepage analysis. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11, 1-13.
  21. Hassani, A. N., Farhadian, H., & Katibeh, H. (2018). A comparative study on evaluation of steady-state groundwater inflow into a circular shallow tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 73, 15-25.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics