Journal of Hydraulic Structures

Journal of Hydraulic Structures

Optimizing the urban runoff collecting network using Harris Hawks single-objective optimization algorithm (a case study of the flood network in West Tehran)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Seyed Masoud Majidi 1
Hamed Reza Zarif Sanayei 1
Ali Raeisi Isa-Abadi 2
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
2 Department of Water Engineering, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
10.22055/jhs.2024.47664.1317
Abstract
Today, optimization is very important and necessary in engineering works and it seems necessary in the field of urban runoff and flood management. In this research, a case study of Darakeh River in Tehran as an important links in flood management and runoff conveying is used to reduce the costs of constructing flood conveying routs and water leakage. In the next step, rainfall values are obtained in return periods of 20, 25, 35, 50, 75 and 100 years by using hydrological relationships. Then, the output runoff is extracted by modeling the network in numerical software and the output hydrographs of the created model areentered into SWMM software. In order to present the output results of the SWMM model in a better format, the SWMM results are entered into SSA software. The SSA results are linked into the Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) algorithm and finally, the construction cost and water leakage functions are optimized. Eventually, the results of HHO are compared with the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm to check the accuracy of HHO. The value of changes for width and height in bridges and channels are compared in two algorithms. As a result, the HHO algorithm reduces the volume of flood and water leakage in different return periods by presenting less cost as compared to the PSO algorithm.
Keywords
Harris Hawks Optimization
Rainfall
Surface Water
Runoff Collecting Network
Flood Management
Subjects
  1. Reddy M. J., Kumar D. N. (2007). Multiobjective differential evolution with application to reservoir system optimization. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, pp: 21(2):136–146.
  2. Pan T, Kao J (2009). GA-QP model to optimize sewer system design. Journal of environmental engineering, pp: 135(1):17–24.
  3. Moghaddamam A, Alizadeh A, Faridhosseini A, Ziaei A. N., Heravi D. F. (2018). Optimal design of water distribution networks using simple modified particle swarm optimization approach. Desalination and Water Treatment, pp: 104: 99–110.
  4. Azari B, Tabesh B (2018). Optimal Design of Stormwater Collection Networks Considering Hydraulic Performance and BMPs. International Journal of Environmental Research, pp: 12: 585-596.
  5. Abdy Sayyed M. A. H., Gupta R, Tanyimboh T (2021). Combined flow and pressure deficit-based penalty in GA for optimal design of water distribution network. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, pp: 27:146-156.
  6. Tanyimboh T. T, Seyoum A. G. (2020). Design optimization of water distribution networks: real-world case study with penalty-free multi-objective genetic algorithm using pressure-driven simulation. Water SA. pp: 46:(3): 465–475.
  7. Ezzeldin R. M., Djebedjian B (2020) Optimal design of water distribution networks using whale optimization algorithm. Urban Water Journal, pp: 17 (1):14-22.
  8. Heydari Mofrad H., Yazdi J. (2022). An enhanced multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for the rehabilitation of urban drainage systems. Engineering Optimization, pp: 54 (2), 349-367.
  9. Diao Y., Ma H., Wang H., Wang J., Li S., Li X., Pan J., Qiu Q. (2022). Optimal Flood- Control operation of cascade Reservoirs Using an Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. Water, pp: 14(8): 1239.
  10. Cemiloglu A., Zhu L., Chen B., Lu L., Nanehkaran Y. A. (2023). Enhancing Urbun Surface Runoff Conveying System Dimensions through Optimization Using the Non-Dominated Sorting Differential Evolution (NSDE) Metaheuristic Algorithm. Water, pp: 15(16): 2927.
  11. Babonneau F., Gilbert D., Piller O., Vial J.P. (2024). Robust optimal design of a tree-based water distribution network with intermittent demand, European Journal of Operational Research, pp: 319 (3): 834-844.
  12. Riyahi M. M., Bakhshipour A. E., Haghighi A. (2023). Probabilistic warm solutions-based multi-objective optimization algorithm, application in optimal design of water distribution networks, Sustainable Cities and Society, pp: 91: 104424.
  13. Jenks B., Pecci F., Stoianov I. (2023). Optimal design-for-control of self-cleaning water distribution networks using a convex multi-start algorithm, Water Research, pp: 231: 119602.
  14. Essamlali I., Nhaila H., El Khaili M. (2024). Optimizing runoff and pollution mitigation through strategic low-impact development (LID) integration in the Bouznika city development plan, Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, pp: 10: 100838.
  15. Liu Z., Han Z., Shi X., Liao X., Leng L., Jia H. (2023). Multi-objective optimization methodology for green-gray coupled runoff control infrastructure adapting spatial heterogeneity of natural endowment and urban development, Water Research, pp: 233: 119759.
  16. Heidari A. A., Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H. (2019) Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, pp: 97:849-872.
  17. Abbasi A., Firouzi B., Sendur P. (2021). On the application of Harris hawks optimization (HHO) algorithm to the design of microchannel heat sinks. Engineering with Computers, pp: 37: 1409-1428.
  18. Elgamal Z. M., Yasin N. B. M., Tubishat M., Alswaitti M., Mirjalili A. S. (2020). An Improved Harris Hawks Optimization Algorithm with simulated Annealing for Feature selection in the Medical field. IEEE Access, pp: 8: 186638-186652.
  19. Wang S., Jia H., Abualigah L., Liu Q., Zheng R. (2021). An Improved Hybrid Aquila Optimizer and Harris Hawks Algorithm for solving industrial engineering optimization problems. Processes, pp: 9(9): 1551.
  20. Nematollahi Z., Zarif Sanayei H. R., (2023). Developing an optimized groundwater exploitation prediction model based on the Harris hawks optimization algorithm for conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater resources, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, pp: 30: 16120-16139.
  21. 2011a. Tehran Stormwater Management Master Plan, Vol 2, Part 3: Urban Food Hydrology & Sediment Load, December 2011. Tehran: Technical & Development Deputy of Tehran Municipality.
  22. 2011b. Tehran Stormwater Management Master Plan, Vol 4: Existing Main Drainage Network, Part 2: Hydraulic Modeling and Capacity Assessment, December 2011. Tehran: Technical & Development Deputy of Tehran Municipality.
  23. Na W., Yoo C., (2018). Evaluation of Rainfall Temporal Distribution Models with Annual Maximum Rainfall Events in Seoul, Korea. Water, pp: 10(10): 1468.
  24. 2008. Hydrologic Modelling System HEC-HMS, Quick Start Guide, Version 4.0. Davis: Institute for Water Resources Hydrologic Engineering Center.
  25. Jang S., Cho M., Yoon J, Yoon Y., Kim S., Kim G., Kim L., Aksoy H., (2007). Using SWMM as a tool for hydrologic impact assessment. Desalination, pp: 212 (1–3): 344-356.
  26. Lord S. A., Ghasabsaraei M. H., Movahedinia M., Shahdany S. M. H., Roozbahani A. (2021). Redesign of stormwater collection canal based on flood exceedance probability using the ant colony optimization: study area of eastern Tehran metropolis. Water Science & Technology, pp: 84 (4): 820-839.
  27. Yazdi, J. (2016). Decomposition Based Multi Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Design of Large-Scale Water Distribution Networks. Water Resources Management, pp: 30 (8): 2749–2766.
  28. Yazdi, J., A. Sadollah, E. H. Lee, D. G. Yoo, and J. H. Kim. (2017). Application of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for the Rehabilitation of Storm Sewer Pipe Networks. Journal of Flood Risk Management, pp: 10 (3): 326–338.