Spiral Flow Measurement at Vertical Intakes Using PTV Method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran.

Abstract

In order to study the characteristics of the different formed free surface vortices at vertical hydraulic intakes, three sets of experiments were conducted. The spiral flow was detected using the Particle Tracking Velocimetry (PTV) measurement technique in three dimensions (3D) by installing two cameras at above and side of the model. The dimensions of model were 2000mm in length, 1300mm in width and 1500mm in height. Through the experiments, extensive data including tangential (Vθ), radial (Vr) and axial (Vz) velocities and their variations with the changing vortex center in different vortex classes, were recorded and analyzed. Using the obtained results, a 3D flow path was drawn for each class of the formed vortex. Moreover, changes in the diameter of the vortex core (Dvo) in the three different classes of vortex were investigated and its changes along the vortex axis were measured. Results showed that the average of Dvo/D (D is the intake diameter) was about 0.14, 0.2 and 0.23 for vortices Class C, B and A, respectively.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Lugt HJ (1983). Vortex Flow in Nature and Technology. J. Wiley.
  2. Knauss J (1987). Swirling flow problems at intakes. Hydraulic Struc. Design Manual. Balkema.
  3. Jorabloo M, Abdolahpour M, Roshan R, Sarkardeh H (2011). A techno-economical view on energy losses at hydropower dams (case study of Karun III Dam and Hydropower Plant). Computational Methods in Multiphase Flow VI. 70, 253.
  4. Sarkardeh H, Zarrati AR, Roshan R (2010). Effect of intake head wall and trash rack on vortices, J. Hydraulic Research, 48(1): 108–112.
  5. Sarkardeh H, Marosi M (2022). An analytical model for vortex at vertical intakes. Water Supply 22(1): 31-43.
  6. Azarpira M, Zarrati AR (2019) A 3D analytical model for vortex velocity field based on spiral streamline pattern. Water Sci Eng 12:244–252.
  7. Suerich-Gulick F, Gaskin SJ, Villeneuve M, Parkinson E (2014). Characteristics of free surface vortices at low-head hydropower intakes. J Hydraul Eng 140(3):291–299.
  8. Suerich-Gulick F, Gaskin S, Villeneuve M, Parkinson É (2014c). Free surface intake vortices: Theoretical model and measurements. J. Hydraul. Res., 52(4), 502–512.
  9. Wang Y, Jiang C, Liang D (2011a). Comparison between empirical formulae of intake vortices. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 49(1), 113–116.
  10. Sarkardeh H, Zarrati AR, Jabbari E, Marosi M (2014). Numerical simulation and analysis of flow in a reservoir in the presence of vortex. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics. 8(4): 598-608.
  11. Khadem Rabe B, Ghoreishi Najafabadi SH, Sarkardeh H (2017). Numerical simulation of air-core vortex at intake. CURRENT SCIENCE. 113(1): 141-147.
  12. Sarkardeh H (2017). Numerical calculation of air entrainment rates due to intake vortices. Meccanica. 52: 3629-3643.
  13. Khadem Rabe B, Ghoreishi Najafabadi SH, Sarkardeh H (2018). Numerical simulation of anti-vortex devices at water intakes. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Water Manag. 171(18).
  14. Esmaeilpoor E, Sarkardeh H, Jabbari E (2021). Numerical Study on Simultaneous Operation of Spillway and Power Intake. Journal of Dam and Hydroelectric Powerplant. 8(30), 33-42 (in Persian).
  15. Taghizadeh AH, Sarkardeh H, Jabbari E (2023). Numerical study on effect of reservoir vortex on velocity distribution profile in pipe. The European Physical Journal Plus. 138(6), 521.
  16. Mousavinia SH, Sarkardeh H, Jabbari E, Taghizadeh AH (2024). Performance of plate and perforated trashracks on vortex prevention at vertical intake. Meccanica. 59(4): 539-559.
  17. Amini AA, Sarkardeh H, Jabbari E, Eidi A (2024). Understanding vortex characteristics in hydraulic systems: a temperature-driven analysis. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 1-13.
  18. Pakdel E, Majdzadeh Tabatabai MR, Sarkardeh H, Ghoreishi Najafabadi SH (2020). Elimination of vortices by wave generation as a hydraulic anti-vortex method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42(11):1–14.
  19. Pakdel E, Sarkardeh H, Ghoreishi Najafabadi SH (2019). Numerical simulation of the effect of waves on the vortex formed in the vertical intake. Modares Civil Eng J. 19(5):59–71 (in Persian).
  20. Zi D, Xuan A, Wang F, Shen L (2020). Numerical study of mechanisms of air-core vortex evolution in an intake flow. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 81:108517.
  21. Khodashenas SR, Roshan R, Sarkardeh H, Azamatullah H (2010). Vortex study at orifice spillways of Karun 3 Dam, J. Dam Eng. 11:131–143.
  22. Taghvaei SM, Roshan R, Safavi K, Sarkardeh H (2012). Anti-vortex structures at hydropower dams. Int J Phys Sci 7(28):5069–5077.
  23. Azarpira M, Sarkardeh H, Tavakkol S, Roshan R, Bakhshi H (2014). Vortices in dam reservoir: a case study of Karun III dam. Sadhana 39(5):1201–1209.
  24. Khanarmuei MR, Rahimzadeh H, Sarkardeh H (2015). Investigating the effect of intake withdrawal direction on critical submergence and strength of vortices. Modares Mechanical Engineering 14 (10), 35-42 (in Persian).
  25. Khanarmuei MR, Rahimzadeh H, Kakuei AR, Sarkardeh H (2016). Effect of vortex formation on sediment transport at dual pipe intakes. Sadhana 41(9):1055–1061.
  26. Sarkardeh H (2017). Minimum reservoir water level in hydropower dams. Chin J Mech Eng 30(4):1017–1024.
  27. Khanarmuei MR, Rahimzadeh H, Sarkardeh H (2019). Effect of dual intake direction on critical submergence and vortex strength, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 57 (2), 272-279.
  28. Monshizadeh M, Tahershamsi A, Rahimzadeh H, Sarkardeh H (2017). Experimental investigation of dynamics of the air-core vortices and estimating the air entrainment rate at a horizontal intake. Modares Mechanical Engineering. 17 (8), 59-67 (in Persian).
  29. Monshizadeh M, Tahershamsi A, Rahimzadeh H, Sarkardeh H (2017). Comparison between hydraulic and structural based anti-vortex methods at intakes. The European Physical Journal Plus 132, 1-11.
  30. Monshizadeh M, Tahershamsi A, Rahimzadeh H, Sarkardeh H (2018). Vortex dissipation using a hydraulic-based antivortex device at intakes. International Journal of Civil Engineering 16, 1137-1144.
  31. Tahershamsi A, Rahimzadeh H, Monshizadeh M, Sarkardeh H (2018). A new approach on anti-vortex devices at water intakes including a submerged water jet. The European Physical Journal Plus, 133(4):143.
  32. Tahershamsi A, Monshizadeh M, Rahimzadeh H, Sarkardeh H (2018). An experimental study on free surface vortex dynamics. Meccanica, 1-9.
  33. Aghajani N, Karami H, Mousavi SF, Sarkardeh H (2019). Experimental study of the effect of the trashrack on the vortex at the intake of the hydroelectric power plants in various flow rates and submergence depths. Journal of Dam and Hydroelectric Powerplant, 6(21):49-62 (in Persian).
  34. Aghajani N, Karami H, Sarkardeh H, Mousavi SF (2020). Experimental and numerical investigation on effect of trash rack on flow properties at power intakes. ZAMM‐Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 100(9).
  35. Amiri SM, Zarrati AR, Roshan R, Sarkardeh H (2011). Surface vortex prevention at power intakes by horizontal plates. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Water Management 164(4): 193–200.
  36. Camnasio E, Orsi E, Schleiss AJ (2011). Experimental study of velocity fields in rectangular shallow reservoirs. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 49(3), 352-358.‏
  37. Sarkardeh H, Jabbari E, Zarrati AR, Tavakkol S (2014). Velocity field in a reservoir in the presence of an air-core vortex. Proc Inst Civ Eng Water Manag 167(6):356–364.
  38. Bashtani A, Sarkardeh H (2022). Design of an Experimental Setup for Free Surface Vortex at Intakes (Including a Review on the Constructed Laboratory Models). Journal of Hydraulic Structures8(2), 68-83.
  39. Raffel M, Willert CE, Scarano F, Kähler CJ, Wereley ST, Kompenhans J (2018). Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide. springer.‏