Construction of Meandering Channel and Its Application in Investigation of Bed Topography around Hydraulic Structures

Articles in Press

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Payame Noor University, Nakhl Street, 193953697, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Persian Gulf University, 7516913817, Bushehr, Iran.

Abstract

Considering river behavior analysis, numerous researchers worldwide have so far attempted to construct experimental channels. Beginning from the upstream side, the channel respectively consisted of an 8-meter-long straight path, two consecutive 180-degree bends, and another 8-meter-long straight path downstream. In addition to presenting the stages of design and construction of this channel, this study provided some instances, where different hydraulic structures, including a T-shaped spur dike, a gate, sharp-edged and wide-edged spillways, submerged vanes, and a bridge pier, were implemented in meandering paths. A comparison of the results from the use of different hydraulic structures in this meandering channel showed that these structures had different effects on bed topography variations. For instance, under similar flow conditions, the maximum scour depth increased in the sharp-edged spillway experiment by approximately 40% compared to that in the wide-edged spillway experiment. In addition, the maximum scour around the T-shaped spur dike located in the external bend was 2.7 times greater than that with the case it was placed at the upstream internal bend. Upon reviewing the outcomes of two scenarios involving the implementation of submerged vanes in proximity to a single pier situated at an angle of 180 degrees within a meandering channel, as compared to the scenario involving a single pier without the use of vanes, it was identified that the maximum scour depth surrounding the bridge pier was reduced by approximately 10% when utilizing submerged vanes in conjunction with the single pier.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Akbari M, Vaghefi M, (2017). Experimental investigation on streamlines in a 180º sharp bend. Acta Sci Tech 39:425-432. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v39i4.29032
  2. Peakall J, Ashworth P, Best J, (1996). Physical modelling in fluvial geomorphology: principles, applications and unresolved issues. The Scientific Nature of Geomorphology. Wiley, New York.
  3. Raudkivi AJ, Ettema R, (1983). Clear-water scour at cylindrical piers. J Hydraul Eng 109:338-350. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:3(338)
  4. Chiew YM, Melville BW, (1987). Local scour around bridge piers. J Hydraul Res 25:15-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688709499285
  5. Chiew YM (1992). Scour protection at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 118:1260-1269. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:9(1260)
  6. Shakibaeinia A, Tabatabai MRM, Zarrati AR, (2010). Three-dimensional numerical study of flow structure in channel confluences. Can J Civil Eng 37: 772-781. https://doi.org/10.1139/L10-016
  7. Nazari-Giglou A, Jabbari-Sahebari A, Shakibaeinia A, Borghei SM, (2016). An experimental study of sediment transport in channel confluences. Int J Sediment Res 31:87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2014.08.001
  8. Vaghefi M, Ghodsian M, Salimi S, (2016). The effect of circular bridge piers with different inclination angles toward downstream on scour. Sadhana 41:75-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-015-0443-x
  9. Wang H, Zhou G, Shao X, (2010). Numerical simulation of channel pattern changes Part I: Mathematical model. Int J Sediment Res 25:366-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(11)60004-8
  10. Yagci O, Celik M.F, Kitsikoudis V, Kirca VO, Hodoglu C, Valyrakis M, Duran Z, Kaya S, (2016). Scour patterns around isolated vegetation elements. Adv Water Resour 97:251-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.10.002
  11. Chavan R, Kumar B, (2017). Experimental investigation on flow and scour characteristics around tandem piers in sandy channel with downward seepage. J Mar Sci Appl 16:313-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-017-1426-6
  12. Zou X, Wang C, Song H, Han Z, Ma Z, Hu W, (2018). Applications of ultrasound imaging system for measuring water-sand parameters during sediment transport process in hydraulic model experiments. J Hydroinform 20:410-423. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2017.025
  13. Ghodsian M, Vaghefi M, (2009). Experimental study on scour and flow field in a scour hole around a T-shape spur dike in a 90 bend. Int J Sediment Res 24:145-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(09)60022-6
  14. Vaghefi M, Ghodsian M, Akbari M, (2017). Experimental investigation on 3D flow around a single T-shaped spur dike in a bend. Period Polytech-Civ 61:462-470. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7999
  15. Vaghefi M, Ghodsian M, Neyshabouri SAAS, (2012). Experimental study on scour around a T-shaped spur dike in a channel bend. J Hydraul Eng 138:471-474. https://doi.org/ 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000536
  16. Wang H, Tang H, Liu Q, Wang Y, (2016). Local scouring around twin bridge piers in open-channel flows. J Hydraul Eng 142:06016008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001154
  17. Abdolahpour M, Yasi M, Behmanesh J, Vaghefi M, (2011). Construction of a concrete bend channel as a hydraulic model. Adv Natural Appl Sci 5:34-40.
  18. Dugue V, Blanckaert K, Qiuwen CHEN, Schleiss AJ, (2013). Reduction of bend scour with an air-bubble screen–morphology and flow patterns. Int J Sediment Res. 28, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(13)60014-1
  19. Khosronejad A, Hill C, Kang S, Sotiropoulos F, (2013). Computational and experimental investigation of scour past laboratory models of stream restoration rock structures. Adv Water Resour 54:191-207. https://doi.org/1016/j.advwatres.2013.01.008
  20. Moharana S, Khatua KK, (2014). Prediction of roughness coefficient of a meandering open channel flow using Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System. Measurement 51:112-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.01.026
  21. Termini D, (2015). Momentum transport and bed shear stress distribution in a meandering bend: Experimental analysis in a laboratory flume. Adv Water Resour 81:128-141. https://10.1061/ASCEHY.1943-7900.0000046
  22. Binns AD, da Silva AMF, (2015). Meandering bed development time: Formulation and related experimental testing. Adv Water Resour 81:152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.11.007
  23. Mera I, Franca MJ, Anta J, Peña E, (2015). Turbulence anisotropy in a compound meandering channel with different submergence conditions. Adv Water Resour 81:142-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.10.012
  24. Pagliara S, Kurdistani SM, Palermo M, Simoni D, (2016). Scour due to rock sills in straight and curved horizontal channels. J Hydro-Environ Res 10:12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2015.07.002
  25. Liu C, Shan Y, Liu X, Yang K, Liao H, (2016). The effect of floodplain grass on the flow characteristics of meandering compound channels. J Hydrol 542:1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.037
  26. Akhtari AA, Seyedashraf O, (2018). Experimental and numerical investigation on vanes’ effects on the flow characteristics in sharp 60° bends. KSCE J Civ Eng 22:1484-1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1743-y.
  27. Vaghefi M, Akbari M, (2019). A procedure for setting up a 180-degree sharp bend flume including construction and examinations with hydraulic structures. Sci Iran Trans A 26:3165-3180. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2018.5033.1054
  28. Moghanloo, M., Vaghefi, M., Ghodsian, M. et al. (2024). The influence of collar parameters on local scour mechanism around the circular pier at the bend. Appl Water Sci 14, 194 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02257-5
  29. Keshavarz, A., Vaghefi, M. & Ahmadi, G. (2024). Collars for Scour Reduction Around Different Shapes of Bridge Piers in a 180° Sharp Bend. Int J Civ Eng 22, 1733–1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-00994-x
  30. Solati S, Vaghefi M, & Ahmadi G, (2023). Scour pattern around a pier in a 180° sharp bend: influence of pier shape under unsteady currents. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 68(12), 1711-1723.
  31. Vaghefi, M, Zarei, E, Ahmadi, G, Behroozi, A. M, (2023). Experimental analysis of submerged vanes' configuration for mitigating local scour at piers in a sharp bend: Influence of quantity, length, and orientation, Ocean Engineering, Volume 289, Part 1, 2023, 116267, ISSN 0029-8018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116267.
  32. Keshavarz, A., Vaghefi, M. & Ahmadi, G, (2022). Effect of the Shape and Position of the Bridge Pier on the Bed Changes in the Sharp 180-Degree Bend. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 46, 2449–2467 .https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00787-5
  33. Sedighi, F., Vaghefi, M. & Zarei, E, (2022). Experimental investigation of flow pattern at 180° bend with rigid bed in effect of twin convergent bridge piers. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 69, 58 https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-022-00110-7
  34. Akbari M, Vaghefi M, Chiew YM, (2021). Effect of T-shaped spur dike length on mean flow characteristics along a 180-degree sharp bend. J Hydrol Hydromech 69:98-107. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2020-0045
  35. Park SW, Ahn J, (2019). Experimental and numerical investigations of primary flow patterns and mixing in laboratory meandering channel. Smart Water 4:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40713-019-0016-y
  36. Serajian MT, Kamanbedast AA, Masjedi A, Heidarnejad M, Hasonizadeh H, (2020). Laboratory evaluation of the combined effect of convergence and submerged vanes on lateral Intakes’ sediment input at 90° river bends. Ain Shams Eng J 11:245-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.09.008
  37. Moghaddassi N, Musavi-Jahromi SH, Khosrojerdi A, (2021a). Effect of Duration on Variations in Bed Topography and Water Surface Profile in a Meandering Channel. J Hydraul Struc 7:22-45. https://doi.org/10.22055/jhs.2021.37497.1173
  38. Moghaddassi N, Musavi-Jahromi SH, Vaghefi M, Khosrojerdi A, (2021b). Effect of Mean Velocity-to-Critical Velocity Ratios on Bed Topography and Incipient Motion in a Meandering Channel: Experimental Investigation. Water 13:883. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070883
  39. Patel, H. kumar, & Kumar, B, (2024). Experimental study on the optimal spur dike shape under downward seepage. Water Science, 38(1), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/23570008.2024.2321423
  40. Pradhan, T. K., Malasani, G. C., Krishna Reddy, S., & Chandra, V. (2024). Investigation on scouring and turbulence characteristics around T-head spur dike. Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249676.2024.2330044
  41. Dehghan D, Vaghefi M, Ghodsian M, (2023). Effects of increasing the width of collar on reduction of scouring surrounding the rectangular piers in a 180-degree bend. Appl Water Sci 13:76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-01884-8
  42. Parsaie A, Shareef SJS, Haghiabi AH, Irzooki RH, Khalaf RM, (2022). Numerical simulation of flow on circular crested stepped spillway. Appl Water Sci 12:215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01737-w
  43. Odgaard, A. Jacob, Wang Yalin, (1991). Sediment Management with Submerged Vanes. I: Theory Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Volume 117, Issue 3, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:3(267)
  44. Ouyang, Huei-Tau, Jihn-Sung Lai, Hsin Yu, and Chin-Huang Lu, (2008). Interaction between Submerged Vanes for Sediment Management. Journal of Hydraulic Research 46 (5): 620–27. doi:10.3826/jhr.2008.3160.
  45. Safaripour, N., vaghefi, M., Mahmoudi, A, (2024). The influence of the submergence ratio of submerged vanes on the slope of the hole around the pier groups in a sharp bend. Journal of Hydraulic Structures; 10(3): 90-118. doi: 10.22055/jhs.2024.46967.1300.
  46. Chooplou, C.A., Vaghefi, M. & Akbari, M, (2023). Effect of repositioned submerged vanes on local scour variations around a pier in a bend: experimental investigation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 8627–8640 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05031-3
  47. Bora K, Kalita HM, (2019). Determination of best groyne combination for mitigating bank erosion. J Hydroinform 21:875-892. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2019.151
  48. Tripathi, Ravi Prakash, Pandey, K. K, (2021). Experimental study of local scour around T-shaped spur dike in a meandering channel. Water Supply; 21 (2): 542–552. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.331
  49. Moghaddassi N, Vaghefi M, Akbari M (2024). Experimental Study: Effects of Pier Position and Critical Velocity Ratio on Scour Pattern in Two Consecutive Bends Under Clear Water Condition. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01434-5
  50. Asadollahi, M., Vaghefi, M. and Tabibnejad Motlagh, M.J., (2021). Experimental and numerical comparison of flow and scour patterns around a single and triple bridge piers located at a 180-degree sharp bend. Scientia Iranica, 28(1), pp.1-14.
  51. Sedighi, F., Vaghefi, M. & Ahmadi, G, (2021). The Effect of Inclined Pair Piers on Bed Topography: Clear Water, Incipient Motion and Live Bed. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 45, 1871–1890 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00481-y.
  52. Dehghan D, Vaghefi M, Ghodsian M (2021). Experimental study of the effect of the length-to-width ratio and skewness angles of the pier installed at the bend on scour pattern. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 43(3):1–17. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s40430- 021- 02884-y
Journal of Hydraulic Structures

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 20 October 2024

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics