Journal of Hydraulic Structures

Journal of Hydraulic Structures

The Optimal Selection of Submerged Vanes Geometric Dimensions in Curved Channels with Sediment Flow

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Parisa Rezaei
Elham Fazel Najafabadi
Mohammad Shayannejad
Department of Water Science and Engineering. College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran, 8415683111
10.22055/jhs.2025.49586.1349
Abstract
One of the major challenges in diverting water from rivers is the intrusion of sediment into intakes, which can cause operational issues and damage infrastructure. Various methods have been explored to mitigate this problem, including the use of submerged vanes. This study employed simulations to evaluate the effectiveness of submerged vanes and the impact of their geometric parameters on reducing sediment inflow. Results showed the sediment transport estimation error for the optimal computational mesh size (2.7cm × 1cm) was 0.55%. The findings indicated that the optimal vane height and length were 0.5 times the flow depth and 2.5 times the vane height, respectively. Additionally, the optimal transverse and longitudinal spacing between vanes, as well as the distance from the nearest vane row to the intake wall, were determined to be 2.17, 5, and 2 times the vane height, respectively. Flow analysis showed that near the bed, the maximum velocity cores were directed toward the outer bend and the intake, whereas at the water surface, these cores became more widely distributed across the channel. Negative vertical velocities were concentrated at the intake entrance. In the absence of submerged vanes, the maximum secondary flow strength was found near the bed across the full channel width. However, when vanes were present, the strongest secondary currents shifted to the left side of the vanes.
Keywords
Sediment discharge
Water intake
Curved channel
Geometric parameters
Simulation
Subjects
  1. Fatehi-Nobarian B, Farshidnia S, Saneie M. Effect of hydraulic and geometrical parameters of skimming wall on controlling sediment entering lateral intakes using harmony search algorithm. Advance Researches in Civil Engineering. 2022 Dec 1;4(4):55-70.
  2. Moradinejad A, Haghiabi A, Saneie M, Yonesi HA. Investigation of the effect of sediment control structures on the kinetic energy of turbulent in the intake entrance. Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research. 2021 Apr 21;22(82):121-46.
  3. Farshidnia S, Saneie M, Hajikandi H, Rostami M. Experimental investigation of impact of length and height of parallel skimming walls on controlling inlet sediment to lateral intake. Water Supply. 2020 May 1;20(3):997-1005.
  4. Farshidnia S, Saneie M, Hajikandi H, Rostami M. Experimental Study on the Placement of the Angle and the Distance of Parallel Skimming Walls to Reduce Inlet Sediment in a Lateral Intake. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering. 2020;28(2):23-9.
  5. Pandey M, Valyrakis M, Qi M, Sharma A, Lodhi AS. Experimental assessment and prediction of temporal scour depth around a spur dike. International Journal of Sediment Research. 2021 Feb 1;36(1):17-28.
  6. Zamani M, Rabiefar H, Rostami M. Experimental evaluation of spur dikes placement position effect on the hydraulic and erosion conditions of intakes. Water supply. 2020 May 1;20(3):900-8.
  7. Moradinejad A, Saneie M, Ghaderi A, Zamanieh Shahri SM. Experimental study of flow pattern and sediment behavior near the intake structures using the spur dike and skimming wall. Applied Water Science. 2019 Nov;9(8):1-1.
  8. Pandey M, Ahmad Z, Sharma PK. Scour around impermeable spur dikes: a review. ISH journal of hydraulic engineering. 2018 Jan 2;24(1):25-44.
  9. Firmansyah R, Jauzi MZ, Istiyanto DC, Subarkah A, Sujoko SU, Wibowo M, Yuniardi RC. Study on the design and implementation of BPPT-lock armored groin for sediment control structure in front of sea water intake. Zona Laut Jurnal Inovasi Sains Dan Teknologi Kelautan. 2023 Nov 9:240-7.
  10. Fahmy WA, Halawa MA, Hekal NT. Reduction of sedimentation and water turbidity at intakes of drinking water treatment plants. Water Science. 2023 Dec 31;37(1):40-56.
  11. Attia K, Elsaid G. The hydraulic performance of oriented spur dike implementation in open channel. InJournal of International Water Technology Conference, IWTC, Alexandria, Egypt 2006 (No. 10, pp. 281-298).
  12. Yossef MF. The effect of groynes on rivers. Literature Review. 2002 Aug 23.
  13. Haider R, Qiao D, Yan J, Ning D, Pasha GA, Iqbal S. Flow characteristics around permeable spur dike with different staggered pores at varying angles. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2022 Apr;47(4):5219-36.
  14. Moradinejad A, Haghiabi AH, Saneie M, Younesi H. Experimental Study on Sediment Control in a Lateral Intake Channel by Using a Spur Dike Combined with a Skimming Wall. Advances in Civil Engineering and Environmental Science. 2025 May 27;2(2):85-96.
  15. Jafari R, Sui J. Velocity field and turbulence structure around spur dikes with different angles of orientation under ice covered flow conditions. Water. 2021 Jul 1;13(13):1844.
  16. Veisi F, Jafari A. Three-dimensional Study of Flow Turbulence Extension around Straight, T and L Shaped Groynes in Open Channles using Physical Model. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering. 2019 Jan 1;42(1):15-29.
  17. Kumar L, Afzal MS. Numerical simulations of scour around vertical wall abutments with varying aspect ratios under combined waves and current flows. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023 Sep 28;11(10):1886.
  18. Fathi A, Zarrati AR, Salamatian SA. Scour depth at bridge abutments protected with a guide wall. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2011 Dec;38(12):1347-54.
  19. Vaghefi M, Solati S, Abdi Chooplou C. The effect of upstream T-shaped spur dike on reducing the amount of scouring around downstream bridge pier located at a 180 sharp bend. International journal of river basin management. 2021 Jul 3;19(3):307-18.
  20. Hamidi M, Sadeqlu M, Khalili AM. Investigating the design and arrangement of dual submerged vanes as mitigation countermeasure of bridge pier scour depth using a numerical approach. Ocean Engineering. 2024 May 1;299:117270.
  21. Dadamahalleh PA, Hamidi M, Khalili AM. Bed sill effect on bridge pier scour with debris obstruction: an experimental investigation. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. 2024 May;9(5):142.
  22. Safaripour N, Vaghefi M, Mahmoudi A. Experimental study of the effect of submergence ratio of double submerged vanes on topography alterations and temporal evaluation of the maximum scour in a 180-degree bend with a bridge pier group. International Journal of River Basin Management. 2022 Oct 2;20(4):427-41.
  23. Safaripour N, Vaghefi M, Mahmoudi A. The influence of the submergence ratio of submerged vanes on the slope of the hole around the pier groups in a sharp bend. Journal of Hydraulic Structures. 2024 Apr 1;10(3):90-118.
  24. Mahdian Khalili A, Akbari Dadamahalleh P, Hamidi M. Experimental evaluation of dune formation downstream of pier scour hole with upstream debris accumulation. Journal of Hydraulic Structures. 2024 Mar 1;10(1):13-28.
  25. Odgaard AJ, Lee HY. Submerged vanes for flow control and bank protection in streams. Iowa City, IA, USA: Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, the University of Iowa; 1984 Jul.
  26. Odgaard AJ, Mosconi CE. Streambank protection by submerged vanes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1987 Apr;113(4):520-36.
  27. Odgaard AJ, Wang Y. Sediment management with submerged vanes. I: Theory. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1991 Mar;117(3):267-.
  28. Barkdoll BD, Hagen BL, Odgaard A. Sediment exclusion at hydropower intakes using submerged vanes. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY (United States); 1995 Dec 31.
  29. Marelius F, Sinha SK. Experimental investigation of flow past submerged vanes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1998 May;124(5):542-5.
  30. Gupta UP, Sharma N, Ojha CS. Performance evaluation of tapered vane. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 2007 Jul 1;45(4):472-7.
  31. Tan SK, Yu G, Lim SY, Ong MC. Flow structure and sediment motion around submerged vanes in open channel. Journal of waterway, port, coastal, and ocean engineering. 2005 May;131(3):132-6.
  32. Ouyang HT. Investigation on the dimensions and shape of a submerged vane for sediment management in alluvial channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2009 Mar;135(3):209-17.
  33. Sharma H, Jain B, Ahmad Z. Optimization of submerged vane parameters. Sādhanā. 2016 Mar;41:327-36.
  34. Karami H, Farzin S, Sadrabadi MT, Moazeni H. Simulation of flow pattern at rectangular lateral intake with different dike and submerged vane scenarios. Water Science and Engineering. 2017 Jul 1;10(3):246-55.
  35. Biswas P, Barbhuiya AK. Countermeasure of river bend scour using a combination of submerged vanes and riprap. International Journal of Sediment Research. 2018 Dec 1;33(4):478-92.
  36. Nakato T, Kennedy JF, Bauerly D. Pump-station intake-shoaling control with submerged vanes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1990 Jan;116(1):119-28.
  37. Raudkivi AJ. Sedimentation: exclusion and removal of sediment from diverted water. CRC Press. 1993.
  38. Wang Y, Odgaard AJ, Melville BW, Jain SC. Sediment control at water intakes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1996 Jun;122(6):353-6.
  39. Ouyang HT. Design optimization of submerged vane system for sediment control. The University of Iowa; 2001.
  40. Ho J, Johnson A, White S. 3-D numerical simulation study of permanent sediment control submerged vanes.
  41. Michell F, Ettema R, Muste M. Case study: Sediment control at water intake for large thermal-power station on a small river. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2006 May;132(5):440-9.
  42. Sarhadi A, Jabbari E. Investigating effect of different parameters of the submerged vanes on the lateral intake discharge located in the 180 degree bend using the numerical model. Civil Engineering Journal. 2017 Dec 10;3(11):1176-87.
  43. Tseng CY, Lee J, Guala M, Musa M. Experimental Tests of Lateral Bedload Transport Induced by a Yawed Submerged Vane Array in Open-Channel Flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2024 Nov 1;150(6):04024045.
  44. Mhsen MA, Hilo AN. The effects of different lateral channel discharge on one row of submerged vanes. InAIP Conference Proceedings 2023 Dec 22 (Vol. 2977, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
  45. Hilo AN. The Effects of submerged vanes inclination angle on sediment transport into sub-channel. Wasit Journal of Engineering Sciences. 2023 Apr 1;11(1):105-15.
  46. Aminian P, Jorabloo M, Ahmadi A. Numerical Study of the Effects of Inlet Geometry on the Performance of the Sediment Bypass Tunnel using SSIIM Numerical Model. Journal of Hydraulic and Water Engineering. 2023 Jul 1;1(1):65-75.
  47. Chauhan V, Singhal GD, Chavan R. A review of sediment deflection in rivers using submerged vanes. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2023 Aug 8;29(4):514-30.
  48. Gumgum F, Cardoso AH. Optimizing the desilting efficiency of submerged vane fields at lateral diversions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2023 Jan 1;149(1):04022031.
  49. Bor A. Experimental investigation of 90 intake flow patterns with and without submerged vanes under sediment feeding conditions. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2022;49(3):452-63.
  50. Baltazar J, Alves E, Bombar G, Cardoso AH. Effect of a submerged vane-field on the flow pattern of a movable bed channel with a 90 lateral diversion. Water. 2021 Mar 18;13(6):828.
  51. Kalathil ST, Murugesan MR, Chandra V. Control of sediment entry into intake canals using submerged vanes with collar. InWater Security and Sustainability: Proceedings of Down To Earth 2019 2021 (pp. 209-216). Springer Singapore.
  52. Serajian MT, Kamanbedast AA, Masjedi A, Heidarnejad M, Hasonizadeh H. Laboratory evaluation of the combined effect of convergence and submerged vanes on lateral Intakes’ sediment input at 90 river bends. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2020 Mar 1;11(1):245-52.
  53. Karami Moghadam M, Keshavarz A, Sabzevari T. The Effect of Diversion Flow, Intake Inlet Shape, Topography and Bed Roughness on the Flow Separation Dimensions and Shear Stress at the Lateral Intake. Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research. 2019 Feb 20;19(73):113-26.
  54. OLSEN NR. SIMULATION OF SEDIMENT MOVEMENTS IN WATER INTAKES WITH MULTIBLOCK OPTION. 5007.
  55. Rijn LC. Mathematical modelling of morphological processes in the case of suspended sediment transport. Waterloopkundig Laboratorium; 1987.
  56. Harlow FH, Nakayama PI. Turbulence transport equations. The Physics of Fluids. 1967 Nov 1;10(11):2323-32.
  57. Launder BE, Spalding DB. Mathematical models of turbulence, text book.
  58. Shirali S, Masjedi A. Control of sediment at lateral intake with using submerged vanes in river bend. Water Resources Engineering. 2018 Aug 23;11(37):13-22.
  59. Odgaard AJ. River training and sediment management with submerged vanes. American Society of Civil Engineers. 2009.
  60. Baduna Koçyiğit M, Koçyiğit Ö. Experimental Investigation of Bridge Scour under Pressure Flow Conditions. Water. 2024 Sep 29;16(19):2773.
  61. Neary VS, Odgaard AJ. Three-dimensional flow structure at open-channel diversions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1993 Nov;119(11):1223-30.
  62. Shaheed R, Mohammadian A, Yan X. A review of numerical simulations of secondary flows in river bends. Water. 2021 Mar 24;13(7):884.
  63. Brethouwer G. Turbulent flow in curved channels. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2022 Jan;931:A21.
  64. Odgaard AJ, Kennedy JF. River-bend bank protection by submerged vanes. Journal of hydraulic engineering. 1983 Aug;109(8):1161-73.
  65. Neary VS, Sotiropoulos F, Odgaard AJ. Three-dimensional numerical model of lateral-intake inflows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1999 Feb;125(2):126-40.
  66. Davoodi L, Shafai Bejestan M. Application of submerged vanes for sediment control at Intakes from Irrigation trapezoidal channels. Water and Irrigation Management. 2012 Feb 20;1(2):59-71.
  67. Montaseri H, Godsian M, Salehi Neyshabouri SAA. Experimental study on design parameters of submerged vanes for sediment control at lateral intake in a 180 degree bend. Modares Civil Engineering journal. 2020 20(1): 161-176 (In Persian).
  68. Fahmy WA, Ali AM, El-Bahlol MN, Ibrahim MM, Samy A. Enhancing baffle columns’ performance to mitigate sedimentation at intake structures. Applied Water Science. 2024 May;14(5):89.
  69. Ezz-Aldeen M, Al-Ansari N, Abd-Albaki Y, Knutsson S, Laue J. Sediment control strategies for sustainable water intake. Dams and Reservoirs. 2021 Mar;31(1):21-30.