Advanced Soft Computing Ensemble for Modeling Contaminant Transport in River Systems: A Comparative Analysis and Ecological Impact Assessment

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Civil engineering department, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran.

10.22055/jhs.2024.47440.1312

Abstract

The paper applies soft computing techniques to contaminant transport modeling in river systems and focuses on the Monocacy River. The research employed various techniques, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Genetic Algorithms (GA), to predict pollutant concentrations and estimate transport parameters. The ANN, particularly the Long Short-Term Memory architecture, had more superior performance: the lowest RMSE of 0.37, and the highest R-squared was 0.958. The RMSE obtained by the ANFIS model was 0.40, with an R-squared value of 0.945. It provided a balance with accuracy and interpretability. SVR performance with RBF kernel was robust; it has attained an RMSE of 0.42 and R-squared of 0.940, along with very fast training times. The flow velocities and the longitudinal dispersion coefficients at different reaches were estimated to be in the range of 0.30 to 0.42 m/s for average flow velocity and 0.18 to 0.31 m²/s for the longitudinal dispersion coefficient. In addition, the potentially affected fraction of species due to peak concentrations was used to reflect the assessment of ecological impact, which had values ranging from 0.07 to 0.35. For the time-varying estimation, there is supposed to be a variation in the dispersion coefficient and the decay rate over 48 hours, from 0.75 to 0.89 m²/s and from 0.10 to 0.13 day⁻¹, respectively. The research demonstrates the potential of soft computing approaches for modeling complex pollutant dynamics and further provides valuable insights into river management and environmental protection strategies.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Chabokpour, J., Study of pollution transport through the rivers using aggregated dead zone and hybrid cells in series models. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2020. 17(10): p. 4313-4330.
  2. Chabokpour, J. and H.M. Azamathulla, Numerical simulation of pollution transport and hydrodynamic characteristics through the river confluence using FLOW 3D. Water Supply, 2022. 22(10): p. 7821-7832.
  3. Guo, Z., et al., Contaminant transport in heterogeneous aquifers: A critical review of mechanisms and numerical methods of non-Fickian dispersion. Science China Earth Sciences, 2021. 64: p. 1224-1241.
  4. Nourani, V., S. Mousavi, and F. Sadikoglu, Conjunction of artificial intelligence-meshless methods for contaminant transport modeling in porous media: an experimental case study. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2018. 20(5): p. 1163-1179.
  5. Ghanbarynamin, S., M. Zaremehrjardy, and M. Ahmadi, Application of soft-computing techniques in forecasting sediment load and concentration. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2020. 65(13): p. 2309-2321.
  6. Kisi, O. and J. Shiri, River suspended sediment estimation by climatic variables implication: Comparative study among soft computing techniques. Computers & Geosciences, 2012. 43: p. 73-82.
  7. Chang, C., et al., Appraisal of soft computing techniques in prediction of total bed material load in tropical rivers. Journal of earth system science, 2012. 121: p. 125-133.
  8. Khan, M.A., J. Stamm, and S. Haider, Assessment of soft computing techniques for the prediction of suspended sediment loads in rivers. Applied Sciences, 2021. 11(18): p. 8290.
  9. Guillet, G., et al., Fate of wastewater contaminants in rivers: Using conservative-tracer based transfer functions to assess reactive transport. Science of the Total Environment, 2019. 656: p. 1250-1260.
  10. Piasecki, M. and N.D. Katopodes, Control of contaminant releases in rivers. I: Adjoint sensitivity analysis. Journal of hydraulic engineering, 1997. 123(6): p. 486-492.
  11. Jamshidi, A., et al., Solving inverse problems of unknown contaminant source in groundwater-river integrated systems using a surrogate transport model based optimization. Water, 2020. 12(9): p. 2415.
  12. Kirkpatrick, J., et al., Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2017. 114(13): p. 3521-3526.
  13. Granata, F., et al., Machine learning algorithms for the forecasting of wastewater quality indicators. Water, 2017. 9(2): p. 105.
  14. Naseri-Rad, M., et al., INSIDE: An efficient guide for sustainable remediation practice in addressing contaminated soil and groundwater. Science of the Total Environment, 2020. 740: p. 139879.
  15. Mirghani, B.Y., et al., A parallel evolutionary strategy based simulation–optimization approach for solving groundwater source identification problems. Advances in Water Resources, 2009. 32(9): p. 1373-1385.
  16. Kargar, K., et al., Estimating longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams using empirical models and machine learning algorithms. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2020. 14(1): p. 311-322.
  17. Pourhosseini, F.A., K. Ebrahimi, and M.H. Omid, Prediction of total dissolved solids, based on optimization of new hybrid SVM models. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023. 126: p. 106780.
  18. Zhang, H., et al., Proposing two novel hybrid intelligence models for forecasting copper price based on extreme learning machine and meta-heuristic algorithms. Resources Policy, 2021. 73: p. 102195.
  19. Gao, Z., et al., A novel multivariate time series prediction of crucial water quality parameters with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2023. 259: p. 104262.
  20. Sakaa, B., et al., Water quality index modeling using random forest and improved SMO algorithm for support vector machine in Saf-Saf river basin. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022. 29(32): p. 48491-48508.
  21. Karim, T., et al., StackAMP: Stacking-Based Ensemble Classifier for Antimicrobial Peptide Identification. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2024.
  22. Ibrahim, D., An overview of soft computing. Procedia Computer Science, 2016. 102: p. 34-38.